Peer Review History: Heavy metal pollution of agricultural soils and health implications at Korsimoro market gardening sites

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Md. Hossain Ali, Bangladesh Agricultural University Campus, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Popa Maria, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, Romania.

(2) Chinyere Ogbodo, National Open University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(3) El Fadel Derradji, Badji Mokhtar University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deshu Mamo Mekuria, Assosa University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Popa Maria, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chinyere Ogbodo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (El Fadel Derradji, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diversity and in situ conservation value of the flora of the Marahoué ranch in the sub-Sudanese forest-savanna contact zone in Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Carlos Prosperi, Blas Pascal University, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Aimen Khalid, Institute of Microbiology, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) M Siddeshwari, Vijayanagara Sri Krishnadevaraya University, India.

(3) Tuba Gül Doğan, Düzce University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Senem GUNES SEN, Kastamonu Universitesi Orman Fakultesi, Turkey.

(2) Suresh Prashad Bhatta, Matedewal Janasahayogi (T&V) Secondary School, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aimen Khalid, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M Siddeshwari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tuba Gül Doğan, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Traditional Brackish Water Crab Traps in Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David E. Martin, Chief Executive Officer, USA.

(2) Prof. Dr. Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Pijush Payra, Ramnagar College, India.

(2) Mayura Khot, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) J. M. Koli, DBSKKV, India.

(2) R. Azhagu Raj, St.Xaviers College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pijush Payra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mayura Khot, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Phosphorus and Sulphur on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s): 

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research , India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rohit Kumar , GLA University , India.

(2) Manish Tomar, CCS HAU, India.

(3) Sunil Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.96/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rohit Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish Tomar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sunil Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determinants of Mode of Delivery: A Cross Sectional Analysis of Maternal and Health System Factors

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zarqa University, Jordan.

Reviewers:

(1) Halidu Imurana, Lucknow University, India.

(2) Raksha Kumaraswamy, Fortis Hospital Bannerghatta Road, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Mohammed, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Halidu Imurana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raksha Kumaraswamy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gender Equality: A Pivotal Goal to the Realization of Sustainable Development Goals in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Shabir Ahmad Dar, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Megersa Tolera, Ethiopia.

(3) R.Senthamizh Veena, India.

(4) Arica Tamang, Sikkim University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sumi Karmakar, Shree Agrasen Mahavidyalaya, University of Calcutta, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shabir Ahmad Dar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Megersa Tolera, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R.Senthamizh Veena, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arica Tamang, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography versus Sestamibi Scan in Preoperative Localization of Solitary Parathyroid Adenoma: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from a Tertiary Care Center in Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagih Mommtaz Ghannam, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Robert Meves, São Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Sukhvinder Singh, USA.

(2) Hosam E. Said, Delta University for Science and Technology , Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G. Sankara Malliga, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Elif Güneş, Bursa City Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Turkey.

(3) Rajan Ghimire, Nepal.

(4) Sarbojeet Goswami, Arka Jain University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sukhvinder Singh, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hosam E. Said, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Contributing to Born Before Arrival (BBA) Deliveries Among Booked Pregnant Women in Harare City: A Health Systems Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S, All India Institutes Of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Sagar, ACTREC, TMC Mumbai, India.

(2) C. Nageswari, Galgotias University, India.

(3) Ilaha Shahverdiyeva, Azerbaijan Medical University, Azerbaijan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dhirenkumar Babubhai Bhoi, Veterinary College, Kamdhenu University, Navsari-396450, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek Sagar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C. Nageswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ilaha Shahverdiyeva, Azerbaijan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Retained fractured Foley catheter: A rare case report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Soumyajit Das, Medical College, India.

(2) John Paul Goh Sczepaniak, SHME, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Priya Nair, Shifa Al Jazeera Medical Centre, UAE.

(2) Sunny Doodu Mante, Ghana.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soumyajit Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John Paul Goh Sczepaniak , USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation, Renewable Energy and Consumption-based Carbon Emissions in India (1990-2021): A Descriptive Analytic Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University,  Israel.

Reviewers: 

(1) Bozena Gajdzik, Silesian University of Technology, Poland.

(2) Priya Harit, Institute of Hotel Management Catering Technology & Applied Nutrition, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Syama U S, Kristu Jayanti (Deemed to be University), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bozena Gajdzik, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priya Harit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA