Peer Review History: Cinema as a Tool for Teaching Psychiatry: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers: 

(1) Pankaj Kumar Singh, GNA University, India.

(2) Sweety Lakra, Adamas University, India.

(3) Evelina Miscin, Croatia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ritu Raj Choudhary, Poornima University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pankaj Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sweety Lakra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Evelina Miscin, Croatia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Machine Learning for Radio Refractivity Prediction across Climatic Zones in West Africa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey  Khlopytskyi, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Matheen Pasha, India.

(2) Seta Boghikian-Whitby, University of La Verne, USA.

(3) Mohit Tiwari, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naitik ST, Dayananda Sagar University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.36/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syed Matheen Pasha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seta Boghikian-Whitby, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohit Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Aneurysmal Shape on Atheromatous Hemodynamics during a Pulsatile Blood Flow

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rachana Pathak, University of Lucknow, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maysaa Jalil Mohammed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Francis Odhiambo, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

(3) Riaz Ahmad, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dibjyoti Mondal, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, India.

(2) Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, ‘Gr.T.Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(3) Jalil Manafian, University of Tabriz, Iran.

(4) R Muthucumaraswamy, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.53/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maysaa Jalil Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Francis Odhiambo, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Riaz Ahmad, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Innovative Approaches for Forest Pest Management in India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Kamal Dyab, Assiut University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Robert Eric, University of Orleans, France.

(2) Jithu U. Krishnan, Kerala Forest Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Robert Eric, France) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jithu U. Krishnan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-vitro Evaluation of Soybean Nodules Associated Bacteria for Their Plant Growth Promoting Ability on Agricultural Soils in Center of Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhruv Prakashbhai Pandya, R. R. Mehta College of Science and C. L. Parikh College of Commerce, India.

(2) Manisha S. Sutare, Shri. YPS College Solnakur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ankita Kumari Bhagat, SKUAST Jammu, India.

(2) Govinda Bahadur K.C, Nepal.

(2) Millar Mmayi, Kenya.

(3) N.Senthilkumar, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), India.

(4) Oscar Arath Grageda Cabrera, Mexico.

(5) Vandana Jangde, Chhattisgarh Institute Of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhruv Prakashbhai Pandya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manisha S. Sutare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Distribution of Urd Bean Web Blight Disease (Rhizoctonia solani) in Tarai Region of Uttarakhand

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Vivek Anand, T. N. B. College, India.

(2) M. Rajalakshmi, Mahalakshmi Women’s College of Arts and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hanaa  A. Abokoura, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute (SWERI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vivek Anand, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Rajalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Open Nucleus Breeding Systems in Livestock Genetic Improvement: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Drazen Duricic, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

(2) Abdullah Hameed Salim, University of Thi-Qar, Iraq.

(3) Krishanender Dinesh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Singaravadivelan, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) Deepak Kumar Kashyap, Dau Shri Vashudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalya, Durg (C.G.), India.

(3) Dhirenkumar Babubhai Bhoi, Veterinary College, Kamdhenu University, India.

(4) Dipanjan Chakraborty, India.

(5) Milena Milojević, Republic Of Serbia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Drazen Duricic, Croatia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdullah Hameed Salim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Krishanender Dinesh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Drivers, Barriers, and Consumer Preferences in Urban Gardening: A Case Study of Hyderabad, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Fikri Adriansyah, Agronomy Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia.

(2) Lorjie Bargaso Bation, Extension and Innovation Davao Oriental State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Emanuele Fontana, SDA Bocconi, Italy.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fikri Adriansyah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lorjie Bargaso Bation,Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Efficacy of GRAS Chemicals, Botanicals and Essential Oils against Bacterial Soft Rot of Tomato Caused by Pectobacterium carotovora pv. carotovora

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Raghvendra Saxena, Amity University Madhya Pradesh, India.

(2) Hafza Asma Shafique, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Masumeh jalalvand, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raghvendra Saxena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hafza Asma Shafique, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Field Survey and Assessment of Fusarium Wilt Incidence in Cotton (Gossypium spp.) in Hanumangarh District of Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashkan Asgari, University of Hormozgan, Iran.

(2) K. Ashok Kumar, Osmania University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashkan Asgari, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Ashok Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA