Peer Review History: Enhancing Soybean Physiology Through Artificial Polyploidy Induction

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Christopher Cullis, Case Western Reserve University, USA.

(2) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, (Affiliated with H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pooja S Beleri, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.

(2) Rajkishore Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Daraj Uddin Prodhan, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pooja S Beleri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajkishore Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md Daraj Uddin Prodhan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chemical Weed Management in Sesame: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

(2) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Abebe, Jinka University, Ethiopia.

(2) D Nagaraju, Government City college, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farrokh Ghahremaninejad, Kharazmi University, Iran.

(2) Iqtiar Md Siddique, The University of Texas at El Paso, USA.

(3) Siti Cahya Santini, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Daniel Abebe, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D Nagaraju, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Information and Communication Technology Utilization in Post Basic Nursing Programme in the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkha Devi, Sikkim Maniapl college of Nursing, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim Adeh, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(2) Amarnath Shanmukhe, BLDEA’s Shri B M Patil Institute of Nursing Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ritika Rocque, College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), India.

(2) S.SankaraVenkata Subramanian, India.

(3) Yaowaret Jantakat, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim Adeh, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amarnath Shanmukhe, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Phytoremediation Potential of Aquatic Macrophytes in the Steel City Area of Jajpur District, Odisha, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India

(2) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Department of Biotechnology, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) David José Miquelluti, Santa Catarina State University, Brazil.

(2) Ravuri Hema Krishna Sastry, Amrita Sai Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(3) S Mukunda Rao,Andhra University, India.

(4) Nur Aina Alisa Binti Adnan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Omayma EL- Sayed Ahmed Mousa, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Raza Ullah Shah, Pakistan.

(3) Sanya Kenaphoom, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (David José Miquelluti, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravuri Hema Krishna Sastry, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S Mukunda Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nur Aina Alisa Binti Adnan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Influencing Medication Adherence in Managing Diabetes Mellitus and Strategies Developed to Improve Compliance

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Putu Dewinta Darmada, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia.

(2) Somaye Moayedi, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran.

(3) T.Prathyusha Rani, Vaagdevi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Putu Dewinta Darmada, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Somaye Moayedi, Islamic Republic of Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T.Prathyusha Rani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancement of Bioactive Constituents and Antioxidant Properties of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato Flour Supplemented with Detarium microcarpum

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Venkatraman Bansode, ICAR-Central Citrus Research Institute, India.

(2) Giridhar Goudar, ICMR National Institute of Nutrition, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venkatraman Bansode, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Giridhar Goudar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Caulerpa sp. Seaweed Meal as a Nutrient-rich Supplement in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Diets

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State  University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Haobijam James Watt, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Paul B. Doronila, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajaykumar Soma Kolhe, SES’s Arts and science college, KBC North Maharashtra University Jalgaon, India.

(2) V.Jayapriya, Idhaya College for Women, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haobijam James Watt, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paul B. Doronila, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of E-Learning Platforms on Students’ Competency Development in Private Secondary Schools in Morogoro Municipality, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Anna Kalizhanova, Karaganda Buketov University, Kazakhstan.

(2) Sylvia Stavridi, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fereshteh Abbasi, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.

(2) Frederick Binfor, Graduate School of Management (GSM), Cote D’Ivoire.

(3) Jusak Patty, Pattimura University, Indonesia.

(4) Omid Allaf-Akbary, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anna Kalizhanova, Kazakhstan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sylvia Stavridi, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Biotechnology: A Global Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2025

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

(2) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinod Kumar, G D Goenka University, India.

(2) Venu Paritala, India.

(3) P S Ramapraba, Panimalar Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mayuri Bhattacharyya, North-Eastern Hill University (NEHU), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinod Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Venu Paritala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P S Ramapraba, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenges and Solutions in Coffee Cultivation: A Case Study of Growers in Chikkamagaluru and Kodagu Districts, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Srinivasan, Sir Issac Newton Law College, India.

(2) S.B.Hareesh, CCRI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Wogayehu Abele Melesse, Sidama Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Srinivasan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.B.Hareesh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA