Peer Review History: Exploring the Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Biotechnology: A Global Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2025

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

(2) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinod Kumar, G D Goenka University, India.

(2) Venu Paritala, India.

(3) P S Ramapraba, Panimalar Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mayuri Bhattacharyya, North-Eastern Hill University (NEHU), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinod Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Venu Paritala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P S Ramapraba, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenges and Solutions in Coffee Cultivation: A Case Study of Growers in Chikkamagaluru and Kodagu Districts, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Srinivasan, Sir Issac Newton Law College, India.

(2) S.B.Hareesh, CCRI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Wogayehu Abele Melesse, Sidama Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Srinivasan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.B.Hareesh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Green Human Resource Management: Evaluating practices, strategies, and challenges in modern organizations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Ridzwan Che Rus, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sadaf Pervez, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Shaik Rehana Banu, Windsor University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hassan Abed Ali Alwan Jubouri, Iraq.

(2) Mohammad Abdullah Al Mamun, Franklin International Business School, Nigeria.

(3) Swati Tomer, Swami Rama Himalayan University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sadaf Pervez, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shaik Rehana Banu, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Probiotic Supplementation in Silkworm (Bombyx mori) Biology: Current Insights and Future Perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh Vitthal Sutar, Shivaji University, India.

(2) Sourabh Maheshwari, ICAR-NIBSM, India.

(3) Rona Mae Pador Viernes, Central Mindanao University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tamal Das, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahesh Vitthal Sutar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sourabh Maheshwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rona Mae Pador Viernes, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Generation Study of Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) under Laboratory Condition on Maize

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Ibrahim Ouda, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Yunus Arifien, Nusa Bangsa University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fransiska Nuning Kusmawati, University of Prof.Dr.Moestopo, Indonesia.

(2) Seham Mansour Ismail, Egypt.

(3) Mustapha Abubakar, Abdullahi Fodiyo University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(4) Bui Tuan Viet, Vietnam.

(5) Umair Masood, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Ibrahim Ouda, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yunus Arifien, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unlocking Potential: A Study on Utilization of post-matric scholarships by undergraduate students

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kleopatra Nikolopoulou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Khoda Meena, Arunachal University of Studies, India.

(2) Vijaya Kumar Chavan, Vignans Foundation for Science Technology and Research, India.

(3) Lincoln V. Tan, Bukidnon State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Busa, Abdul’aziz Inusa, Federal University Dutsin-Ma, Nigeria.

(2) Sunday Emmanuel Nnamdi, Federal University Dutsinma, Nigeria.

(3) Udaya, St Aloysius (Deemed to be University), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khoda Meena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vijaya Kumar Chavan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lincoln V. Tan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence in the New Era of Sericulture

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Kuban State Techno-logical University, Russia.

(2) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Tarun Madan Kanade, Symbiosis Institute of Operations Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), India.

(2) Somanka Sanyal, Midnapore City College, India.

(3) Zhao Changyi, Tomsk State University, Russian.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Meenakshi Sharma, Sri Sai University, India.

(2) Tsegaye Bekele Mekonnen, Hawassa University, College of Forestry and Natural Resources, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tarun Madan Kanade, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Somanka Sanyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zhao Changyi, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Harnessing the Gut-Muscle Axis: Nutritional Strategies to Improve Physiotherapy Outcomes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran, BGC Trust University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Renuka, India.

(2) Hossein Karballaei Mirzahosseini, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Renuka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hossein Karballaei Mirzahosseini, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Refining Technologies And their Impact in Natural Fibers: A Brief Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. D.B. Jani, Gujarat Technological University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohit Kumar, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Lee Moyo, Harare Institute of Technology, Zimbabwe.

(3) Poornesh M, St Joseph Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Belay Sitotaw Goshu, Dire Dawa University, Ethiopia.

(2) Nur Amirah Bt Mohd Zahri, SEGI University, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohit Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lee Moyo, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Poornesh M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of a 100% Drug Prescription Fill Policy on Physical Activity and Quality of Life among Hospital Staff: A Cross-sectional Study from Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

(2) Prof. Hamdy A, Sliem, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Hitesh Chaudhari, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, India.

(2) Vasandiya Kinjal D, Shree Dhanvantary Pharmacy College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hitesh Chaudhari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vasandiya Kinjal D, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA