Peer Review History: Moringa oleifera L. Leaf Fractions Improve Survival and Ameliorate Antiretroviral Drug-induced Toxicities in the Canton-S Drosophila melanogaster

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Prem K. Ramasamy, Brandeis University, USA.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rama Shankar, India.

(2) Avinash A. Gunjal, Siddhi’s Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bondarieva Iryna, National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine.

(2) Etuh Monday Alexander, University Of JOS, Nigeria.

(3) Konatham Teja Kumar Reddy, University College of Technology, Osmania University, India.

(4) Sumit Nandi, Gupta College of Technological Sciences, India.

(5) Yasmin Momin, Annasaheb Dange College of B.Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rama Shankar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Avinash A. Gunjal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mapping Urbanization Intensity and Directional Growth in Kozhikode, India: A 30-Year Spatio-Temporal Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. LUO Ching-Ruey (Edward), National Chi-Nan University, Taiwan.

(2) Prof. Yu Huan, Chengdu University of Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Arpita Chaudhury Aich, IEM affiliated to University of Engineering and Management, India.

(2) Athiwat Phinyoyang, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

(3) Priyanka Mishra, KIIT Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sanjay Kumar V S, NATPAC, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arpita Chaudhury Aich, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Athiwat Phinyoyang, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Priyanka Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Student Internship on Career Readiness Skills of BEEd and BSEd Student Interns of St. Francis Xavier College

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius.

Reviewers:

(1) Alka Srivastava, LLRM Medical College, CCS University, India.

(2) Faiza Binti Omar, SEGi University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mary Cordella Cruz, Nrpthunga University, India.

(2) Maruf Abdela Abibaker, Rift valley University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alka Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Faiza Binti Omar, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Tuna Bone Waste (Thunnus sp.) as a Hydroxyapatite Source: Synthesis and Characterization for Biomaterial Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Nagwa Ahmed Kamel Ahmed, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Mona M. Amin Abdel-Fatah, National Research Centre (NRC), Egypt.

(3) Siham Lhimr, University Mohammed V, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Esraa Al Sarray, Iraqi Ministry of Education, Iraq.

(2) Naeima Houssein, University of Benghazi, Libya.

(3) Rara Mitaphonna, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia.

(4) Siham Lhimr, University Mohammed V, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nagwa Ahmed Kamel Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mona M. Amin Abdel-Fatah, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Siham Lhimr, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Agra Region, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Monier Morad Wahba, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Satyajeet, CCS HAU, Regional Research Station, India.

(2) S. Balaji Nayak, ANGRAU-RARS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satyajeet, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Balaji Nayak, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis and Antimicrobial Profiling of a Pyrazole-Based Schiff Base Incorporating 2,4-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Saja Ayad Jassim, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Kehinde Ezekiel Ajibulu, Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Madani Salim, University of Ferhat Abbas Setif 1, Algeria.

(2) Mohammed Alwan Farhan, Diyala university, Iraq.

(3) Munther Abduljaleel Muhammad-Ali, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(4) V.Ravikumar, Kamala Institute of Technology And Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saja Ayad Jassim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kehinde Ezekiel Ajibulu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Nutritional and Physiological Benefits of Bee-Derived Products: Honey and Pollen as Emerging Functional Foods

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Youssef SALAMA, University Moulay Ismail, Morocco.

(2) Iris Lobos Ortega, INIA CHILE, Chile.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kabore Jean Axel Tegwende, Universite Joseph KI-ZERBO, Burkina Faso.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Youssef SALAMA, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iris Lobos Ortega, Chile) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gerontological Implications of Artificial Sweeteners Marketed in India: A Comprehesnsive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Faisal, Sohar University, Oman.

Reviewers:

(1) Shubham Bhatt, India.

(2) Hanaa Said Elsayed Mousa, Egypt

(3) Monika Shriram Kherade, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marwa Ibrahim, Cairo university, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.46/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shubham Bhatt, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanaa Said Elsayed Mousa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Monika Shriram Kherade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Conservation Agriculture Practices and Their Impact on Soil Health and Pest Dynamics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Seome Michael Swafo, University of Limpopo, South Africa.

(2) Usama Yaseen, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia.

(3) Rajib Pati, Central Coffee Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seome Michael Swafo, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Usama Yaseen, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajib Pati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Overview on Emerging Agri-tech Solutions for Sustainable Agricultural Development

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan,  Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Farhang Salehi, Iran.

(2) Ritwik Sahoo, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hastirullah Fitrah,  Universitas Achmad Yani, Indonesia.

(2) Lisa Hermawati, Baturaja University, Indonesia.

(3) Pradeepto Pal, College of Horticulture, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), India.

(4) Seifallah Andayesh, Persian gulf  university, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Farhang Salehi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ritwik Sahoo, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA