Peer Review History: An Overview of Coal Gangue Resource Utilisation: A Brief Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Figen Balo, Firat University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Honglei Liu, China University of Mining and Technology, China.

(2) Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Honglei Liu, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management Aspects of Farmer Producer Companies (FPCs) in Dharwad District, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sasikanth R, S V Agricultural College, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anayatullah Nayaji, Ch.B.P Government Engineering College, India.

(3) Umesh S. Kollimath, Adhalrao Patil Institute of Management & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sasikanth R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anayatullah Nayaji, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Umesh S. Kollimath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bio-Efficacy Studies of Biostimulant (Budmaker) about Growth, Yield and Shelf-Life of Nanasaheb Purple Seedless Grape under Multilocation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Asaad Kadhim Abdullah, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Swatantra Yadav, CSAUA&T, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asaad Kadhim Abdullah, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swatantra Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Sheep Milk in Livelihood Security of Shepherds in Semi-arid Tropical India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Kumar Mishra, ANDUAT, India.

(2) Sree Lakshmi A, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Kumar Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sree Lakshmi A, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Production Enhancement of Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Using Bio-fertilizer, Organic Manure and Micro-nutrients in Uttar Pradesh’s Central Plain Zone, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogesh Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rajkishore Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) V R Senthamizhkumaran, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajkishore Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (V R Senthamizhkumaran, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Oral Wafer Technology: Revolutionizing Drug Delivery for Enhanced Patient Compliance and Bioavailability of Specific Low Dose Drug Categories

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) B Joshna, GITAM School of Pharmacy, India.

(2) B Raja Narender, CVM College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) K. Venkata Gopaiah, JNTU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B Joshna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B Raja Narender, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K. Venkata Gopaiah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Ecofriendly Control Measures against Fruitfly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) Infestation in Sponge Gourd (Luffa cylindrica L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Srinivasa Reddy, Professor, Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Gayathri Devi S.S, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Srinivasa Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gayathri Devi S.S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth, Yield and Quality Attributes of Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) cv. Kalptaru

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Francis Maingi, Kibabii University, Kenya.

(2) Ravinder Kaur, Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francis Maingi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravinder Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Efficacy of Nano Fertilizer on Yield and Physico-chemical Quality of Okra Fruit

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Dr.  Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernández, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Kwaku Asamani, Sunyani Technical University, Ghana.

(2) Jyotsna Dayma, Nirwan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Kwaku Asamani, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyotsna Dayma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bio-efficacy Studies of Biostimulant (Budmaker) in Relation to Growth, Yield and Shelf-life of Thompson Seedless Grape under Multilocation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Amrita Kumar Sarkar, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Rizwan Rafique, University of Florida, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amrita Kumar Sarkar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rizwan Rafique, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA