Peer Review History: Enhancing Cancer Treatment: Integrating Pharmacometrics and Personalized Medicine in Oncology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Adeleye A. Edema, The University of Tulsa, USA.

(2) Sanyogita Shahi, Kalinga University, India.

(3) Vinit Kumar Ramawat, Metro College of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adeleye A. Edema, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanyogita Shahi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vinit Kumar Ramawat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Systematic Review of the Therapeutic Potential Use of Exosomes in Diabetic Foot Ulcers Healing

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Riddhi Ganatra, India.

(2) Khadija Muktar Sukola, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.

(3) Simerjit Singh, Taylors University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Riddhi Ganatra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khadija Muktar Sukola, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Simerjit Singh, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Approaches for Haploid detection in Maize

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernández, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Contescu Elena Laura, Romania.

(2) Sonali Ambadas Aware, VNMKV, India.

(3) Florin SALA, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alan Joel Servin Prieto, Instito Tecnologico Superior De Lerdo, Mexico.

(2) Dilip Kumar Verma, India.

(3) Dimpee Singh Gonge, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry Mhow (Indore), NDVSU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Contescu Elena Laura, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sonali Ambadas Aware, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Florin SALA, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Paradigm Shift in Agriculture: Using Mushroom Metabolites for Sustainable Plant Disease Control and Crop Health

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Asma Shahzad, Lahore College for Women University, Pakistan.

(2) Tapas Ranjan Das, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asma Shahzad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tapas Ranjan Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-vitro Evaluation of Biocontrol Agents against Eggs of Meloidogyne incognita Infesting Mulberry

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Andrzej Kowalski, Jan Kochanowski University, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) KOUAKOU Yadom Yao Francois Regis, Nangui Abrogoua University, Côte d’Ivoire.

(2) Anupam Kumar, Abhilashi University, India.

(3) Sachin Kumar, Constituent Govt. College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Le Thi Mai Cham, Biotechnology Center of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

(2) Mohammed Bukar Aji, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (KOUAKOU Yadom Yao Francois Regis, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anupam Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sachin Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Haemato-biochemical Profile of Indigenous Nattukuttai Breed Calves Fed with Varying Levels of Energy and Protein

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajni Arora, CVAS, INDIA.

(2) Khin Maung Latt, University of Veterinary Scienc, Myanmar.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajni Arora, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khin Maung Latt, Myanmar) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Phosphatic Fertilizers (PROM and DAP) on Soil Microbial Diversity Across Different Plant Growth Stages of Watermelon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Avdesh Bhardawaj, India.

(2) Hala Kandil, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avdesh Bhardawaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hala Kandil, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Divergence in Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merrill) Using Mahalanobis D² Statistics and Principal Component Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Hemanshukumar Jekishandas Maisuria, Gujarat Biotechnology Research Center, India.

(2) Ghassen Abid, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hemanshukumar Jekishandas Maisuria, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghassen Abid, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Next Generation Sequencing in Parasitic Disease Research: Applications and Advances

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Manjula K T, Govt. Brennen College, India.

(2) Nazir Ahmad Tookhy, Herat University, Afghanistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manjula K T, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nazir Ahmad Tookhy, Afghanistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Alpha-Amylase Inhibitory Activity of Phenol Rich Fraction of Newbouldia laevis Using Two In-vitro Models

Editor(s):

(1) V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Noumi Mustapha, Algeria.

(2) Bolisetty Padmavathi, Chalapathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(3) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Louiza BOUDIBA, Echahid Cheikh Larbi Tebessi University (Tebessa university), Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noumi Mustapha, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bolisetty Padmavathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Keshamma E, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA