Peer Review History: Effect of sulphur and boron on nutrient uptake by Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Aqeel Johni Nassir, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Ali Saleem Khuraywit Alshahmani, University of Wasit, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Justus  Eronmosele Omijeh, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria.

(2) Pankaj Kumar Yadav, Inidia.

(3) Rakesh Kumar, SKUAST-Jammu, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aqeel Johni Nassir, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Saleem Khuraywit Alshahmani, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Silage Fresh Odot Grass (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Mott) as Ruminant Feed

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Prof. Lanzhuang Chen, Minami Kyushu University., Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dessie Yigzaw, Injibara University, Ethiopia.

(2) Sababa Fatima, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

(3) Kownin Abdimahad, Jigjiga University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chrisostom Ayebazibwe , Uganda.

(2) Sonu Kumar Yadav, NDVSU, India.

(3) Srinivas Sathapathy, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dessie Yigzaw, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sababa Fatima , Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kownin Abdimahad, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diagnosis of fungi contaminating local and imported fruits in Kirkuk using PCR

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. J. Rodolfo Rendón Villalobos, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Oyekemi Akinmusire, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(2) Mohamed M Deabes, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Essoh Ayimba, Universite de Lome, Togo.

(2) Mansooreh Mazaheri, Standard Research Institute, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oyekemi Akinmusire, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohamed M Deabes, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Profitability of Small-Scale Grow-Out Production of Caged Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus in the Volta Lake of Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State  University of Sonora,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mark Eka Ali, National Biotechnology Research and Development Agency, Nigeria.

(2) Alex Barakagira, Kyambogo University, Uganda.

(3) Suranjit Roy, Assam University , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alex Barakagira, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suranjit Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of a 90-day Curing Time on the Mechanical Properties of Stabilized Compressed Earth Blocks Reinforced with Banana Trunk Powder

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) K.P. Srinivasa Perumal, India.

(2) Longtau Pirmak, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.Amarnath, Kamala Institute of Technology & SciencE (JNTUH), India.

(2) Niamien Alfred Kouame, Félix Houphouet-Boigny University, Côte d’Ivoire.

(3) Sivasubramanian Palanisamy, P T R College of Engineering & Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K.P. Srinivasa Perumal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Longtau Pirmak, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dynamics of Social Support and its Relation with Psychological Wellbeing among Women Undergoing In vitro Fertilization Treatment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kleopatra Nikolopoulou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Maqbool Ur-Rahman, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(2) Oleena Chaudhuri, York University, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali Abdul Kadhim Dadoosh, Iraq.

(2) Sheela R Sharma, Rama University Kanpur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Maqbool Ur-Rahman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oleena Chaudhuri, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genotype × Environment interaction of elite mulberry genotypes in different seasons for vegetative and fruit traits

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Chumkijini Chhatria, Sambalpur University, India.

(2) Osama A. Khodair, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) SK Nuri, Krishnath College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chumkijini Chhatria, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Osama A. Khodair, Egypt) | File 1| File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Feeding of Babul Pod (Acacia nilotica) Powder and Tannin Extract Powder on Growth Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Haemato-Biochemical Profile, Anti- oxidative Status and Immune Status in Male Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anjaneyulu Vinukonda, Strides Pharma Inc., USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Osama Hefny Abdelshaffy Mahmoud Matloup, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Sherif Mohamed Shawky, University of Sadat City, Egypt.

(3) Asri Apriana Widu, Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Osama Hefny Abdelshaffy Mahmoud Matloup, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sherif Mohamed Shawky, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Asri Apriana Widu, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Compatibility of Trichoderma asperellum with Different Fungicides

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil .

Reviewers:

(1) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Ramchandra Suthar, Pramukh Swami Science & H. D. Patel Arts College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A.M.Ramachandran, Dr. N. G. P. Arts And Science College, India.

(2) Akeel Emad Mohammeds, University of Kufa, Republic of Iraq.

(3) A.M.Ramachandran, Dr. N. G. P. Arts and Science College, India.

(4) Mohamed Farouk Attya Ahmed, Central Lab. of Organic Agriculture (CLOA), Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(5) Sahar Murmu, BCKV, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramchandra Suthar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marker Assisted Breeding of Resistance to Fusarium Wilt and Phenotypic Evaluation of Chickpea Backcross Lines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, , Khon Kaen University,Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) N.Geetha, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India.

(2) Roxana Horoias, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farkad Hawas Musa, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Frederico Denardi, Brazil.

(3) Priyanka Sinha, Bundelkhand University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.72/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N.Geetha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roxana Horoias, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA