Peer Review History: Impact of Front-Line Demonstrations on Taramira (Eruca sativa)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bilal Ahmad wani, Govt. Degree College Anantnag, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Perves Ahmed, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Manish Kumar, Career Point University Kota, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdullahi Lawan, Yobe State College of Agriculture Gujba Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Goutam Mahata, Pulses and Oilseeds Research Station, Department of Agriculture, India.

(3) Manish Kumar, Career Point University Kota, India.

(4) Nayanbhai Baria, N. M. College of agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(5) Pooja Kashyap, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

(6) Reda E. Essa, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Perves Ahmed, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genotypic and Phenotypic Correlation Analysis of Morphological and Yield-Contributing Traits in Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Genotypes Under Organic Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

(2) Prof. Fakhrul Islam Monshi, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Indar Pramudi, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia.

(2) Pragalbh Tiwari, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology And Sciences (SHUATS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Basirou Dembele, Université Nazi Boni, Burkina Faso.

(2) Mohammed Bukar Aji, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Indar Pramudi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pragalbh Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Presacral Dermoid Cyst in a Young Female: Diagnostic Evaluation and Surgical Approach Selection

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Itamar S. Oliveira-Júnior, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Amir Tahavvori, United States.

(2) Kirin Rambaran, Trinidad.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hendro Sudjono Yuwono, University Islam Bandung (Unisba), Indonesia.

(2) Kithsiri Senanayake, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences Rajarata Univeersity of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(3) Saïd Haddadi, Youcef Benkhedda Algiers University 1, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amir Tahavvori, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kirin Rambaran, Trinidad) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Best Practices of Teachers in Maintaining Students Discipline: A Phenomenological Inquiry

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jummai Ibrahim Sagir, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

(2) Henderikus Dasrimin, Universitas Nusa Nipa, Indonesia.

(3) Pamela Akinyi Mudis, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Sahlan, Nurul Jadid University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jummai Ibrahim Sagir, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Henderikus Dasrimin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pamela Akinyi Mudis, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Freeze-Drying Conditions on the Functional Properties of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria and Methods to Assess their Viability

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Michael Oghenejobo, Delta State University, Nigeria.

(2) Mohd Akmal Azhar, University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Michael Oghenejobo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohd Akmal Azhar, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Benefit-Cost Analysis of Fish Farming in Azamgarh District of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Hesham Abozaid, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Gokul S, Central Agricultural University, India.

(3) Maria Caroline Nakafeero, College of Natural Sciences, Makerere University Kampala, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avik Bhanja, Vidyasagar University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hesham Abozaid, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gokul S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Maria Caroline Nakafeero, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Botanical based Nano Formulations on the Morphological Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Dariellys Martinez Balmori,State University of Northern Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF), Brazil.

(2) Syed Khalid Mustafa, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Khaled Khanchouch, University of Tunis, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Harshal Eknath Patil, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dariellys Martinez Balmori, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syed Khalid Mustafa, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Khaled Khanchouch, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biochemical Characteristics and Plant Growth Promoting Properties of Zinc Solubilizing Bacteria Isolated from the Rhizosphere Soil of Paddy (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Andargachew Belay Abrham, Injibara University, Ethiopia.

(2) Wiseman Matsapa, Centre for Development Studies college, Zimbabwe.

(3) Divyesh Vasava,Arihant Bio Science (India) Pvt Ltd, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bireshwar Bera, ST. Joseph’s College (Univ. Section), India.

(2) Nivedita Bagga, CSKHPKV, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Andargachew Belay Abrham, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wiseman Matsapa, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Divyesh Vasava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Insect-derived Antimicrobial Peptides: Biochemical Mechanisms, Microbial Targets, and Synthetic Biology Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Youssef Salama, University Moulay Ismail, Morocco.

(2) Shankar S. Yelmame, Sandip Foundation’s, Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arif Ansori, Indonesia.

(2) Shristi Aich, Kristu Jayanti College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Youssef Salama, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shankar S. Yelmame, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Aerobic Composting of Antibiotic-contaminated Manure: Degradation Processes and Their Effects on Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Asha Bhausaheb Kadam, India.

(2) Divyanshi Sharma, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asha Bhausaheb Kadam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Divyanshi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA