Peer Review History: The New Sine Type II Generalized Topp-Leone Distribution: Structural Formulation and Statistical Properties

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed S. Hamed, Gulf Colleges, Saudi Arabia.

(2) R Muthucumaraswamy Rajamanickam, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Isra Natheer Alkallak, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed S. Hamed, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R Muthucumaraswamy Rajamanickam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Photogrammetric Analysis of Beautiful Smiles of the Ijaws and Isokos Ethnic Groups

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sangeetha M G, SRM Dental College, India.

(2) Niti Dharmendra Shah, United States.

(3) Naorem Jenny, Pd Dental Health Care and Research Centre, India.

(4) Sumit Singh, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences Atariya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gopala Krishna. Ganta, University of Michigan, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sangeetha M G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Niti Dharmendra Shah, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Naorem Jenny, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sumit Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cultural Heritage Literacy among Tertiary Social Studies Majors in Northern Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maya Tcholakova, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria.

(2) Dr. Pescaru Maria, National University of Sciences and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Romania.

(3) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Carl Jay P. Diamante, Philippines.

(2) Gleemoore C. Makie, Benguet State University Bokod Campus, Philippines.

(3) Muhammad Jamil, GC Women University Sialkot, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anik Widiastuti, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Carl Jay P. Diamante, Philippine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gleemoore C. Makie, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Jamil, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Employee Engagement as Predictor of Organizational Performance of Banana Plantation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Yuvika Singh, The ICFAI University, India.

(2) Muhamad Risal Tawil, Politeknik Baubau, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Bhardwaj, IEC University, India.

(2) Ashwini Sonawane, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yuvika Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhamad Risal Tawil, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marketing Efficiency Analysis: A Case of the Eswatini Pork Value Chain

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean Béguinot, University of Burgundy, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Roya Seyfipour, Azad University, Iran.

(2) Diah Nurdiana, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditya Sinha, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Yuniana Cahyaningrum, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roya Seyfipour, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Diah Nurdiana, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Community engagement and Blue-entrepreneurship performance in Tanzania: A Comparative Case Study of Bagamoyo District and Kinondoni District

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, Harbin Engineering University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Champa Bosu, Chouddagram Government College, Bangladesh.

(2) Mahera Imam, Bharathidasan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alfrojems, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.

(2) Ali Khalaf Hussain Al-hachami, Wasit University, Iraq.

(3) Gyanu Maharjan, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Champa Bosu, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahera Imam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analyzing the Role of Government Support in the Development of the Guntur Chilli Yard: A case study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, Federal Scientific Center of vegetable production, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Surapak Pallavi, PJTAU, India.

(2) Allan Tembo, National Institute of Public Administration (NIPA), Zambia.

(3) Firew Hailemariam, Oda Bultum University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Surapak Pallavi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Allan Tembo, Zambia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Firew Hailemariam, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 |NA


Peer Review History: Cost and Profitability Analysis of Mango Cultivation: Evidence from South Konkan Region of Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ha Van Trung, Wuhan University, Vietnam.

(2) Moses Obasesin, Anchor University Lagos, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C. Ramhnehzauva, Govt. Lawngtlai College, Mizoram University, India.

(2) Olena Osharovska, State University of Intelligent Technologies and Telecommunications, Ukraine.

(3) Sabita Mondal, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ha Van Trung, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Moses Obasesin, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Construction Technology for Mass Concrete Bearing Platforms in Deep Foundation Pits

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hamdy Mohy El-Din Afefy,Pharos University. Alexandria. Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Falah Hasan, University of Kufa, Iraq.

(2) S. Krishnapriya, Anna University, India.

(3) Jimmy Adora Nebrida, Philippines.

(4) Hafizan Bin Hashim, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Balaraj V, Rao Bahadur Y. Mahabaleswarappa Engineering College, India.

(2) Bhavesh Kataria, Emory University, USA.

(3) Mohammed Yusuf, Northeastern University, United States.

(4) Shaik Subhan Alisha, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Falah Hasan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Krishnapriya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jimmy Adora Nebrida, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hafizan Bin Hashim, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Power System Reliability with Machine Learning-Enabled Fault Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) V N R Sai Krishnakari, Kakaraparti Bhavanarayana College (A), India.

(2) Ibrahim Al-Shourbaji, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dinesh Popatbhai Pipalava, Lukhdhirji Engineering College, India.

(2) Michael Funso Adaramola, Lagos State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Balaji V, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V N R Sai Krishnakari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ibrahim Al-Shourbaji, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA