Peer Review History: Bilateral Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Revealing Malignant Hypertension and Terminal Renal Failure: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francesco Saverio Sorrentino, Sorrentino Studio Oculistico, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahak Bhandari, MGM Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Imen Zone, Mouwassat Medina Hospital, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahak Bhandari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imen Zone, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cutaneous Presentation in Neonatal Lupus, Don’t Miss Anything!

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Serpil Ünver Saraydın, Cumhuriyet University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Navid Namazi, Azad Islamic University of Medical Science -Tehran Branch, Iran.

(2) Ashwini B, Sree Uthradom Thirunal Academy Of  Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Navid Namazi , Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashwini B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agricultural Extension in Post-COVID Era: Lessons Learned and Path Forward

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tadeusz Hryniewicz, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanee Chauhan, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Amar Vijay Jamnekar, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, India.

(3) Helen Grace R. Abarcar, Philippines.

(4) Ode Rosemary Ayiba, National Teachers Institute, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hamdi Sadeh, Palestine.

(2) Jasim Mohammed Saleh, University of  Fallujah, Iraq.

(3) Stephen Victor Gana, Kwararafa University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanee Chauhan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amar Vijay Jamnekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Helen Grace R. Abarcar, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ode Rosemary Ayiba, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: “Evaluation of Yellow Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) as a Fish Feed Ingredient: Effects on Growth, Blood Parameters, and Immunology in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)”

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State  University of Sonora,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Oke, Israel Opeyemi, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Oke Ojo Pelumi, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(3) Seeta Dewali, Kumaun University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oke, Israel Opeyemi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oke Ojo Pelumi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Seeta Dewali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Seeta Dewali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Correlation of Insulin Resistance and sensitivity in Pregnancy with Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes: A Pilot Observational Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

(2) Dr. Eghon Guzman B, Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio, Santiago, Chile.

Reviewers:

(1) Vijaya Sree Medarametla, Mamata Medical College, India.

(2) P Umar Farooq Baba, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vijaya Sree Medarametla, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P Umar Farooq Baba, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Learner Engagement, Learning Adversities and Academic Achievements of Learners with Disabilities as Perceived by Teachers: A Mediating Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Saroj Nayyar, Kalinga University, India.

(2) Benadda Abdelouahid, Ahmed ZABANA University, Algeria.

(3) Frankie Anak Subon, Quest International University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kelzang, Norbuling Central School, Bhutan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saroj Nayyar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Benadda Abdelouahid, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Frankie Anak Subon, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: Effects of Dietary Menadione Sodium Bisulphite (Vitamin K3) on Growth Performance, Flesh Quality, Intestinal Morphology of Juvenile Gnathanodon speciosus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nagwa Ibrahim Saad Abu-Zahra, Egypt.

(2) Ashmita Debnath, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shashikant J. Meshram, DBSKKV, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nagwa Ibrahim Saad Abu-Zahra, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashmita Debnath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Essential 21st Century Skills for the Labour Market and Education: Conceptual Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Mauritius.

Reviewers:

(1) Constance Chifamba, Solusi University, Zimbabwe.

(2) Israel Olusegun ADEDEJI, Federal College of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Shipra Maitra, Institute for Human Development, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Constance Chifamba, Zimbabwe) | File 1 |File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Israel Olusegun ADEDEJI, Nigeria) | File 1 |File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shipra Maitra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Development-Induced Resettlement on the Occupational Structure of Slum Dwellers: A Case of Cuttack City, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yu Huan, Chengdu University of Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepshikha Jain, India.

(2) Kousik Das Malakar, GDC Memorial College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abimbola Omolabi, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepshikha Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kousik Das Malakar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Investigation in Use of IPSAS 1 Standard for Performance Evaluation in Government Universities: A Case Study of Kufa University, Iraq

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kidega Charles, Kyambogo University, Uganda.

(2) Ashutosh Kumar Singh, AKS University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aseh Emmanuel Vitung, The Catholic University of Cameroon, Cameroon.

(2) Umar Bala, Federal College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kidega Charles, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashutosh Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA