Peer Review History: Status of pH, Electrical Conductivity, Organic Carbon, and Available Nitrogen in Soils of Different Land Situations

Editor(s):

(1) Asist.Prof.Dr. Ismail Seven, University of Firat, TURKEY.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Mazedul Haque Sachchu, Islamic University, Bangladesh.

(2) Eman Hamdy Abd El-Azeiz, Water and Environment Research Institute, Egypt.

(3) Shoma Hore, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhsin Hassan Kafinga, Aliko Dangote University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Yadesa Bato Ejeta, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Mazedul Haque Sachchu, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eman Hamdy Abd El-Azeiz, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shoma Hore, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on Mycosphaerella

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tzasna Hernandez Delgado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.

(2) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, University of Technology,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Urmila Rana, Dr. P.D.B.H.P.G. College, India.

(2) Sanjay Yadav, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(3) Priyanka Sinha , Bundelkhand University , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Urmila Rana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjay Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Priyanka Sinha , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraints and Suggestions on Recommended Potato Cultivation in Hassan District, India: Voices from the Field

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON , The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Joseph Kulwa Katobesi, Moshi Co-operative University, Tanzania.

(2) Aatish Kumar Sahu, OUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cosmos Kwaku Nutakor, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joseph Kulwa Katobesi, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aatish Kumar Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Weed Management Practices on Weed Parameters and Economics of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under NE Ghats Zone of Odisha, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Rama Shankar Singh, Dr Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Nasir Mehmood Khan, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shivendra Singh, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Yapi Arnaud-Freddy, Pelefero Gon Coulibaly University, Côte d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rama Shankar Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nasir Mehmood Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Organic Farming in India: Current Status and Opportunities for Future Development in the Northeast Region

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo , Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kumar Darjee, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

(2) Snehal Nagorao Dhawale, Msp arts, science &kpt commerce college, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dilip Kumar Darjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Snehal Nagorao Dhawale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chilaiditi Syndrome and Antropyloric Stenosis: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Itamar S. Oliveira-Júnior, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Zaka Ur Rab Siddiqui, Al Iman General Hospital, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Vivek P Sarma, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

(3) Vaibhav Mishra, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.13/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zaka Ur Rab Siddiqui, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vivek P Sarma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vaibhav Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Critical Review on Evaluating Integrated Pest Management in Agricultural Systems: Progress and Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ines ksentini, University of Sfax, Tunisia.

(2) Huda Ibraheim Abdel-Aliem, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ines ksentini, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Huda Ibraheim Abdel-Aliem, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Risk Factors and Visual Outcomes of Presenile Cataracts at a Tertiary Care Centre in Western Uttar Pradesh: A Retrospective Study

Editor(s):

(1) Tatsuya Mimura, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Saswati Sen, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Shubhangi Setia, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ragni Kumari, Era University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saswati Sen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubhangi Setia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Epidemiological Observation for the Cases of Lipoma in the Surgical Departments

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagih Mommtaz Ghannam, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Oshin Verma, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Oshiozimede Quincy AIGBONOGA, Ambrose Alli University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oshin Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oshiozimede Quincy AIGBONOGA, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Memory Theory of Cortical Homunculus: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bruno Renan Borelli, State University of Central West, Brazil.

(2) Hamed Jamalpour, Karaj Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bruno Renan Borelli, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hamed Jamalpour, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA