Peer Review History: Assessment of Antifungal Activity of Henna (Lawsonia inermis) Leaves Extract (Aqueous) with Commercial Antifungal Drug by Disc Diffusion Method against Canine Fungal Dermatitis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University,Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahraa Isam Jameel, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Aishwarya Narendra Kapse, D. Y. Patil Education Society, Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Tareq Rifaaht Minnat, Diyala University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chieh Chen, Taiwan.

(2) R. R. Taur, IBT, MGMU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.23/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zahraa Isam Jameel, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aishwarya Narendra Kapse, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tareq Rifaaht Minnat, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge Levels of Chickpea Cultivation Technologies among Beneficiary and Non-Beneficiary Farmers under Cluster Front Line Demonstration in Bikaner District, Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Chand Goyal, India.

(2) Sri Vidya Rani. N, Dr.Y.S.R.Horticultural University, India.

(3) Paul Chuks Okonkwo, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kungumaselvan T, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Chand Goyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sri Vidya Rani. N, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Paul Chuks Okonkwo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ensemble Learning Techniques for Breast Cancer Prediction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Panduranga Vital Terlapu, Aditya Institute of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Chandra Shikhi Kodete, Eastern Illinois University, United States of America.

(3) Chandrani Chakravorty, RV College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Selin Ceren YAMAK, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Panduranga Vital Terlapu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chandra Shikhi Kodete, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chandrani Chakravorty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Giant Phyllodes Tumor in the Male Breast: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Itamar S. Oliveira-Júnior, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Robert Meves, São Paulo University, Sao Paulo,  Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Guilherme Vicentini, Brazil.

(2) Nuha Alsaleh, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Noor Fouad Mohammed Ali, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Charbel AOUN, Lebanese University, Lebanon.

(2) Estabraq AR. AL-Wasiti, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(3) Puia Dragos, “Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania.

(4) Rohit Saha, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.06/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Guilherme Vicentini, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nuha Alsaleh,Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Noor Fouad Mohammed Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: School Management Committees and the Pitfalls of Decentralized Governance in India: A Qualitative Study from Jharkhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

(2) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Tauqeer Abdullah, University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Andy Lim Teik Hong, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

(3) Naseer Ahmed, Government Postgraduate College, Pakistan.

(4) Amitkumar Subhashrao Manekar, SSGMCE, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aftab Alam, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, India.

(2) Edison D. Bravo, Cagayan State University – Carig, Philippines.

(3) Linda Merzougui, Hunan Institute of Engineering, China.

(4) Migena Alimehmeti, University of Tirana, Albania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tauqeer Abdullah, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Andy Lim Teik Hong, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Naseer Ahmed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Amitkumar Subhashrao Manekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Maize Germplasm for Resistance against Spotted Stem Borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) M V Dabhi, Anand Agricultural University, India.

(2) S. Sambathkumar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M V Dabhi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Sambathkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing the Outcome of Students’ Poetry Engagement through Poetry Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Suleyman Hakan, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Turkey.

(2) Bizuum Godwill Yadok, Federal University of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arifiana Tri Wulandari, PPM Al-Fatih Klaten, Indonesia.

(2) Roseline Jesudas, Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suleyman Hakan, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bizuum Godwill Yadok, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Giant Lipoma of the Male Breast: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, And University of Mississipi Medical Center, , USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rashmi Yadav, India.

(2) Ahmad Elhussein Mohamed, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rashmi Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmad Elhussein Mohamed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ileal Mass Presenting as Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia: A Rare Presentation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Owais Zargar, University of Jammu, India.

(2) Tayyaba Batool, King Fahad Hospital – Al Baha, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mustafa Ugur, Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

(2) Ankit Agarwal, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.

(3) Antonio Gligorievski, Faculty of Medical Sciences University “Goce Delcev” Shtip; University Clinic of surgical diseases “St. Naum Ohridski “ Skopje, North Macedonia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Owais Zargar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tayyaba Batool, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Techniques for Assessment of Vertical Spray Pattern: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Saranya Selvarangan, Auckland Institute of Studies, New Zealand.

(2) Ashok Kumar, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agricultural and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Karuna Rajaram Pawar, V. N. Arts, Commerce and B.N. Science Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saranya Selvarangan, New Zealand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashok Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA