Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Bharathi, Jayaprakash Narayan College of Engineering, India.

(2) S. Velmurugan, Kongunadu Arts and Science College, India.

(3) Jesal Desai, Charotar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Bharathi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Velmurugan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jesal Desai, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Roshni Thampi, KAU, India.

(2) Krishnaraju Venkatesan, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roshni Thampi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishnaraju Venkatesan, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. José Alberto Duarte Moller, University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mandar P. Joshi, GES’s R. H. Sapat College of Engineering, Management Studies and Research, India.

(2) Chetan S, VTU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mandar P. Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chetan S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Banuprakash K G, College of Agriculture, GKVK, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Devamani M, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Banuprakash K G, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Devamani M, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) A.Kamaruniza, University of Madras, India.

(2) Rajalakshmi Anantharaman, Somaiya Vidyavihar University, India.

(3) T.Thirunavukkarasu, KIT-Kalaignarkarunanidhi Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.24/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A.Kamaruniza, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajalakshmi Anantharaman, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T.Thirunavukkarasu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Shubham Yadav, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(2) Nadir Ali Bhangar, Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(3) Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, Parul Institute of Technology, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shubham Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nadir Ali Bhangar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Tahir Anwar, Pakistan.

(2) D. Selvaraj, Subbalakshmi Lakshmipathy College of Science (Affiliated to Madurai Kamaraj University), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Tahir Anwar, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D. Selvaraj, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Inampudi Sailaja, Swaminarayan University, India.

(2) Seiam Hassan Abd Elghany Seiam, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(3) Rajath Kumar, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Inampudi Sailaja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seiam Hassan Abd Elghany Seiam, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajath Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Elliza Emily Perrone Barbosa, Federal University of Amazonas, Brasil.

(2) Abdulhakim Bawadekji, Aleppo University, Syria.

(3) Mandakini Ingle, S. P. Dnyanasadhana College of Arts, Science and Commerce, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elliza Emily Perrone Barbosa, Brasil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdulhakim Bawadekji, Syria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mandakini Ingle, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Kassem, Mansoura Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, Egypt.

(2) Yerasi Kavya, Dr.Y.S.R. Horticultural University, India.

(3) S.Navaneetha Krishnan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Kassem, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yerasi Kavya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.Navaneetha Krishnan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA