Peer Review History: Advancements and Applications of 3DP Printing in Pharmaceutical Development and Biomedical Sciences

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Somdet Srichairatanakool, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Krupalkumar Morker, USA.

(2) Shubhrat Maheshwari, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, India.

(3) Sanatan Majhi, Utkal University, India.

(4) Omid Ashkani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anirudh Mehta, United States of America.

(2) Arsh Chanana, NIMS Institute of Pharmacy, NIMS University Rajasthan, India.

(3) Mahmoud Mahyoob Alburyhi, Sana’a University, Yemen.

(4) Mallamma T, Sri Adichunchanagiriri College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) S Manikandan, BGSB University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krupalkumar Morker, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubhrat Maheshwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanatan Majhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Omid Ashkani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Healthcare Workers Factors Contributing to HIV Testing Service Integration in Primary Healthcare Facilities of Homa Bay County, Western Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Halah Haitham Mohammed Ali Al Haideri, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Ejembi ANYEBE, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

(2) Tse Kingsly Nkwoh, Texila American University, Guyana.

(3) Ambomatei Calson Aba-Andou, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pamela Mbuya Otieno, Daystar University of Kenya, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Ejembi ANYEBE, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tse Kingsly Nkwoh, Guyana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ambomatei Calson Aba-Andou, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Importance of Environmental Factors Influencing Dengue: A Strategic Approach in Managing Dengue Transmission in Outpatient Clinical Settings in Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

(2) Dr. Jihad Adnani, University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Franco Johny V, Kerala University of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) C H. B. Praveena Devi, Joginpally B. R. Pharmacy College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) CH. B. Praveena Devi, Joginpally B. R. Pharmacy College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Franco Johny V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C H. B. Praveena Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Avocado Leaf Extracts on Lipid Profile and Blood Pressure in Cadmium Induced Hypertensive Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nakaziba Rebecca, Lira University, Uganda.

(2) Dhafer Shaher Mohamed Aljaleedi, Lahjj University, Yemen.

(3) Kumlachew Mergiaw Abtew, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nakaziba Rebecca, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhafer Shaher Mohamed Aljaleedi, Yemen) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kumlachew Mergiaw Abtew, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phenotypic Characterization of Indigenous Chicken, Daohaita in Chirang District of Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Sariffudin Fatmona, Universitas Khairun, Indonesia.

(2) Awoke, Obinna Okpaga, Ebonyi State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Omid Sofalian, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.

(2) Valery Sonola, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sariffudin Fatmona, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Awoke, Obinna Okpaga, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Asymmetric Myocardial Hypertrophy and Post-exercise Malaise: A Diagnostic Trap Not to Be Overlooked

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Scicchitano Pietro, “F. Perinei” Hospital, Altamura (BA), Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Soumen Jana, Manipal Hospital, India.

(2) Nirmal J Kaur, Cardiometabolic Institute New Jersey, USA.

(3) Anju Paul, Government medical college Jalgaon, India.

(4) Agustín Joison, Cordoba Catholic University, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manaswi Chigurupati, USA.

(2) Yasser Mohammed Hassanain Elsayed, Egyptian Ministry of Health (MOH), Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soumen Jana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nirmal J Kaur, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anju Paul, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Agustín Joison, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Lymphomatoid Papulosis in a Patient with Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma: Clinical Presentation and Management Insights

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabhakar Mariappan, Medicover Cancer Institute, India.

(2) Varun Kumar Pala, USA.

(3) B. L.T. Balasuriya, Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital and Post Graduate Training Institute, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. L.T. Balasuriya, Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital, Sri Lanka.

(2) Chitranga Kariyawasan, SRI Jayewardenepura General Hospital, Sri Lanka.

(3) Rajni Kumari Rai, Santosh Medical College, India.

(4) Riju Aikkal, India.

(5) Sumit Nandi, Gupta College of Technological Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prabhakar Mariappan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Varun Kumar Pala, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B. L.T. Balasuriya, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agronomic Production Strategies to Meet the Fodder Requirement of Livestock for Sustainable Productivity: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Wilson Henrique Tatto, Brazil.

(2) V. Jayalalitha, Veterinary University Training and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shraddha Vekariya, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Sosena Fentahun, Debre Markos University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wilson Henrique Tatto, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Jayalalitha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cloud-Based Solutions for Scalable Non-profit Project Management Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Omveer Singh, Gautam Buddha University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sureshkumar Somanathan, Strayer University, USA

(2) Antoine Trad, France

(3) Jelena Zascerinska, Centre for Education and Innovation Research, Latvia

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sureshkumar Somanathan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Antoine Trad, France) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jelena Zascerinska, Latvia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Google Earth Engine in Flood Disaster Management: A Review of Capabilities and Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bahman Veisi Nabikandi, University of Tabriz, Iran.

(2) Ikhlas Nur Muhammad, Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yaowaret Jantakat, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bahman Veisi Nabikandi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ikhlas Nur Muhammad, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA