Peer Review History: Recurrent Anencephaly in Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Risk Factors and Management

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Pradnya Kale Jain, India.

(2) Samuel Danley, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Necati Ucler, Gaziantep Universitiy, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pradnya Kale Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samuel Danley, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Overview of Smartphone Addiction Levels among College Students

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kavita Sharma, Panjab University Chandigarh, India.

(2) Kadek Sri Ariyanti, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bindiya Tater, Medicaps University, Indore, India.

(2) Lal Mani Pokhrel, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(3) Razif Sazali, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kavita Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kadek Sri Ariyanti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Quinoxaline-Based Compounds as Potential Antiviral Agents against Emerging Viruses

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. K.V. Ramanath, Rajeev College of Pharmacy (Approved by PCI, New Delhi, Recognized by Government of Karnataka, Affiliated to RGUHS, Bangalore), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Alemu Tadesse Feroche, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

(2) Ayele Wondatir Kelile, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) João Rufino de Freitas Filho, Rural Federal University of Pernambuco, UFRPE, Brazil.

(2) Kabange Kasumbwe Laurel, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

(3) Kawther A.Abdualhameed, University of Baghdad, Callege of Education for Pure science(Ibn Al-Haitham ), Iraq.

(4) Palvi Sharma, Abhilashi College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) Somayeh Sattari Alamdar, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(6) Teguh Hari Sucipto, Institute of Tropical Disease, Airlangga University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alemu Tadesse Feroche, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayele Wondatir Kelile, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Conditions for Convex Optimization in 𝑳𝒑-Spaces

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jacek Dziok, University of Rzeszow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Dasari Ratna Babu, PSCMR College of Engineering & Technology, India.

(2) Chathuri Weeragunarathna Sahabandu, The Open University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dasari Ratna Babu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chathuri Weeragunarathna Sahabandu, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biology of Brinjal Shoot and Fruit Borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) at Room Temperature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Imamuddin Shah, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Kaushik Pramanik, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Imamuddin Shah, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kaushik Pramanik, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Physical Status of the Dam and Its Environments for Compliance with Dam Safety Guidelines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nese Yilmaz, Associate Professor, Istanbul University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Toderas Mihaela, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Sayedarash Hosseini Sabzevari, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran.

(3) Edwin Kipkirui, Tongji University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Toderas Mihaela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sayedarash Hosseini Sabzevari, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Edwin Kipkirui, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Is the Race Still between Trauma and Diabetes? – Reviewing the Most Common Reasons for Lower Limb Amputations in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Triki Mohamed Amine, Sahloul University Hospital, Tunisia.

Reviewers:

(1) Anees Adel Hjazeen, Jordan.

(2) Sara Shreen, Deccan School of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amenu Wirtu, USA.

(2) Abdi Amin Abdukadir, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anees Adel Hjazeen, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sara Shreen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Predictive Cybersecurity Risk Modeling in Healthcare by Leveraging AI and Machine Learning for Proactive Threat Detection

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leandro A. Pasa, Campus Medianeira da Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Tosin Clement, University of Louisville, United States.

(2) B.V. RamaKrishna, Vignan Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(3) Vidhya G, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Darlington Ekechukwu, University of East London, United Kingdom.

(2) Ibrahim Ahmad Isah, Federal University Dutse, Nigeria.

(4) Nikhil Dhiman, California State University, United States of America.

(5) S.DeepaLakshmi, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.57/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tosin Clement, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B.V. Rama Krishna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vidhya G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Stability Study of Wind Turbine Tower Cranes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

(2) Dr. P. Elangovan, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Benrabah DJAIDIR, University of Djelfa, Algeria.

(2) Reffas Omar, University of Constantine 1, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Benrabah DJAIDIR, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Reffas Omar, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge and Practices of Dietary Supplement Use in Type 2 Diabetes Management: A Study in Two Hospitals in Guyana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Konatham Teja Kumar Reddy, Osmania University, India.

(2) Shweta Bhandari, Sumandeeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kamal Goyal, RIMT University, India.

(2) Kibur Hunie Tesfa, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Konatham Teja Kumar Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shweta Bhandari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA