Peer Review History: Natural Sweeteners: Health Benefits and Processing Compatibility

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ferial Mohamed Abu- Salem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Miriam Amarachi Mike, University of Notre Dame, USA.

(2) Ogboenyie Goodluck Chibunna, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hendi Wijaya, Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Soteria Purwokerto, Indonesia.

(2) Kemila P, PSGR Krishnammal College for Women, India.

(3) Pradeep Gaikwad, R.B.Attal Arts, Science and Commerce College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Miriam Amarachi Mike, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ogboenyie Goodluck Chibunna, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Productivity of Major Pulses in Cropping Systems Adopted by Farmers in Chhattisgarh Plains in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Gidey Tareke Gebremedhin, Axum University, Ethiopia.

(2) Gangadhar K, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(3) Bernard Yumbya, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Fauzi Bin Mohd Yunus, Polytechnic of Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia.

(2) Nayanbhai Baria, N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(3) P.K.K.S. Gunarathne, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gidey Tareke Gebremedhin, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gangadhar K, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bernard Yumbya, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Four Different Methods of Measuring Biparietal Diameter through Comparative Analysis: A Prospective Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine And University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Nand Kishor Gupta, Uttar Pradesh University Of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Wafaa Mohamed Ibrahim Diab, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nand Kishor Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wafaa Mohamed Ibrahim Diab, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Inter Relationship among the Important Heritable Yield Attributing Traits and Identification of Promising Genotypes of Teasle Gourd (Momordica subangulata Blume Subsp. renigera) under Terai Zone of West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Manisha Thakur, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rajesh. K, College of Food Science and Technology, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(3) Waikhom Jupiter Singh, South Asian Institute of Rural and Agricultural Management (SAIRAM), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manisha Thakur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajesh. K, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Waikhom Jupiter Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of inter relationship among the important heritable yield attributing traits and identification of promising genotypes of teasle gourd (Momordica subangulata Blume subsp. renigera) under Terai zone of West Bengal.

Editor(s):

Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

The peer review history will be available very soon.

Peer Review History: Posterior Dorsal Epidural Abscess in a Pregnant Woman

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) B.M.Munasinghe, Sri Lanka.

(2) Akwasi Antwi-Kusi, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suharmanto, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B.M.Munasinghe, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akwasi Antwi-Kusi, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Compatibility of Herbicides with Micronutrient Formulation for Foliar Application in Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Momodu Jalloh, Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute (SLARI), Eastern Technical University of Sierra Leone (ETU-SL), Sierra Leone.

(2) Mauro Wagner de Oliveira, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Momodu Jalloh, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mauro Wagner de Oliveira, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soft Drink Storage among Retailers in Dar es Salaam Tanzania: Examining Practices, Knowledge, and Key Determinants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashiq Hussain, Punjab Food Authority, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jintana Wiboonsirikul, Phetchaburi Rajabhat University, Thailand.

(2) Samson Marvellous Oladeji, Purdue University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prasad Patil, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jintana Wiboonsirikul, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samson Marvellous Oladeji, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA