Peer Review History: Evaluation of Profitability in Chinese Snack Food Enterprises: A DuPont Empirical Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohan Phuyal, Soka University of Japan, Japan.

(2) Rahmon A. Folami, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria.

(3) Tudose Mihaela Brindusa, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dr. Aziz, Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohan Phuyal, Japan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rahmon A. Folami, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tudose Mihaela Brindusa, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Taxation Effects on Government Revenue in Nigeria 2007-2023: Econometric Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Alexander Oluka, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

(2) Adekoya Adesanya Augustine, Babcock University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zakariyau Gurama, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alexander Oluka, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adekoya Adesanya Augustine, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Physiochemical Parameters of Water in Different Poultry Farms of Warangal District, Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rahul Kumar Jaiswal, National Institute of Hydrology, WALMI Campus, Bhopal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Amos, Jummai Tidi, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

(2) Dhiraj Kumar, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Talal Ahmed, Bahria School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amos, Jummai Tidi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhiraj Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Vigneshwaran. K, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Shani Gulaiya, Galgotias University, India.

(3) Md. Ariful Islam, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vigneshwaran. K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shani Gulaiya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md. Ariful Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Structural Elucidation of Some Antibiotics against Wound Bacterial Pathogens from Penicillium Species Using Agrowastes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sirigireddy Sivajothi, Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sabira Sultana, GCUF, Pakistan.

(2) Vaishali D. Naphade, Sandip University, India.

(3) Ogboenyie Goodluck Chibunna, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(4) Mohammed F. Al Marjani, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mabicka Obame Rolf Gael, Universite des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku, Gabon.

(2) Shams Ismeal, AL-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sabira Sultana, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vaishali D. Naphade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ogboenyie Goodluck Chibunna, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mohammed F. Al Marjani, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mycological Medium for the Production of Antibiotics against Urogenital Bacterial Pathogens from Natural Sources

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suraj G. Malpani, Shivlingeshwar College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Najdat Bahjat Mahdi, Kirkuk University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhoj Raj Singh, India.

(2) Bushra Jasim Mohammed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suraj G. Malpani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Najdat Bahjat Mahdi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Global Plastic Pollution and the Nigerian Dimensions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) M.V.Raju, India.

(2) Shahina N N, Rain Forest Research Institute, India.

(3) P.Lakshmi Devi Menon, NSS College Nemmara, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.S.S. Murthy, India.

(2) Nwabuisi Simon Onyekachi, Univeristy of Chinese Academy of Science, China.

(3) Sree R Nair, Sophia College for Women (Empowered Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.V.Raju, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahina N N, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P.Lakshmi Devi Menon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Improvement of the Mechanical and Water Absorption Properties of C. Citratus Fibre Reinforced Polyester Composite: Response Surface Methodology Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Sumesh, M.I.E.T. Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Thuany Espirito Santo de Lima, Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca (CEFET/RJ), Brazil.

(2) G. Punitha Kumari, J. J College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thuany Espirito Santo de Lima, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Punitha Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Silvopastoral Systems in India for Fodder Production and Livestock Sustainability: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Berihun Kibret, Mekdela Amba University, Ethiopia.

(2) Swati Mehta, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Berihun Kibret, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swati Mehta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethical and Regulatory Challenges for Contract Research Organizations Conducting (Outsourced) Clinical Research in Sub-Saharan Africa with a Case Study of Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Chaudhry, India.

(2) Svyatoslav Milovanov, USA.

(3) Rajasekhar Reddy Poonuru, ST. Peter’s Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(4) Thamizh Selvam N, National Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amgad M. Rabie, Dikernis General Hospital, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunil Chaudhry, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Svyatoslav Milovanov, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajasekhar Reddy Poonuru, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Thamizh Selvam N, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA