Peer Review History: Farmer Awareness and Socio Economic Determinants of PM KUSUM Adoption in Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) K.Balaji, Christ University, India.

(2) Tamer Mansour, Egypt.

(3) Baribuma Gbaarabe, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K.Balaji, Christ University, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tamer Mansour, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Baribuma Gbaarabe, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysing the Role of Mobile Financial Services (MFS) in Financial Inclusion: A Data-driven Exploration of CDIP’s Journey

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Nuhu Abubakar, Maryam Abacha American University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Estu Widarwati, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Sutaatmadja, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nura Ibrahim Mukhtar, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Nigeria.

(2) Sharifah Zannierah Syed Marzuki, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Nuhu Abubakar, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Estu Widarwati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Vachellia nilotica mediated biosynthesis of Zinc oxide nanoparticles, efficacy and safety evaluation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, National university of Colombia Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Anand Maurya, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(2) Dharmasoth Rama Devi, Vignan Institue of Pharmaceutical Technology, India.

(3) Jivan Rameshrao Kote, Shivaji Unversity Kolhapur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anuupama Suchiita, Maulana Azad Medical College, India.

(2) Reena Pappachan Geore, M G University, Kottayam, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anand Maurya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dharmasoth Rama Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jivan Rameshrao Kote, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marketing Constraints in the Potato Supply Chain: Perspectives from Stakeholders in Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology division National Research centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Devendra Kumar Kurrey, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Sri Fajar Ayu, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anamika, G D Goenka University, India.

(2) Arun Bhadauria, Amity University Lucknow, India.

(3) Iyabo Adeoye, National Horticultural Research Institute, Nigeria.

(4) Pavlo Hryhoruk, Khmelnytskyi National University, Ukraine.

(5) Yogita Sharma, Sanjay Gandhi Institute Of Dairy Technology, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Devendra Kumar Kurrey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sri Fajar Ayu, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of crop residue management on Soil Microbiology, Nutrient Dynamics, and Growth Performance of wheat crop

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jibril Mohammed, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

(2) Nilima Pradeep Tidar, Mumbai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jibril Mohammed, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nilima Pradeep Tidar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Genetic Diversity in Maturity Duration among Pigeonpea Genotypes Grown under Off-season (Rabi) Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Chitti Bharatkumar, University of Agricultural Sciences,India.

(2) Anise Jorfi, Khouzestan Applied Science University, Iran.

(3) S. Vishnupriya, UBKV, INDIA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditi Chaudhary, College of Applied education and Health Sciences (CAEHS), India.

(2) Samir Khairi Lazim, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(3) Waikhom Jupiter Singh, South Asian Institute of Rural and Agricultural Management (SAIRAM), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chitti Bharatkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anise Jorfi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Vishnupriya, INDIA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Budding Techniques in Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L): Timing and Success

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Komal Shekhawat, Rajasthan Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anukiran Sahu, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K L Mokariya, Government Engineering College Valsad, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Komal Shekhawat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anukiran Sahu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Chilli Genotypes in Vertisols of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Roxana Horoias, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Goitseone Malambane, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Botswana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roxana Horoias, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Goitseone Malambane, Botswana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gastric perforation secondary to trichobezoar: a case report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasanth T S, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Kanwar Singh Goel, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prasanth T S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanwar Singh Goel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Rural Farmers’ Perception and Utilization of Traditional Medicines in Imo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Dr.  Wang Guangjun, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Reza Zargaran Khouzani, Iran.

(2) Nketia Anthony, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adv Saurav Narayan, Central University of Punjab, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Reza Zargaran Khouzani, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nketia Anthony, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA