Peer Review History: Industrialization and Economic Development in Tanzania from Independence to Today: A Review of Historical Strategies, Challenges and Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alexandru Trifu, University of Iasi, Romania.

(2) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Florin Marius Pavelescu, Institute of National Economy, Romania.

(2) Rose Kavitha, New Horizon College of Engineering, India.

(3) Georgios Nasios, University of West Attica, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Subrat Kumar Ratha, Central University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Florin Marius Pavelescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rose Kavitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Georgios Nasios, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: The Pros and Cons of Offering Sex Education in the Philippine Basic Education Curricula

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Prerna Karulkar, Jnana Prabodhini’s Institute of Psychology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) Shriram N. Kargaonkar, MAEER’s MIT Arts Commerce and Science College, India.

(3) Sandeep Arya, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prerna Karulkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shriram N. Kargaonkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sandeep Arya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Double Gastric Peptic Perforation in a 61-Year-old Patient: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Balasubramanian Arumugam Jr., India.

(2) Sunday-Nweke Nneka Alice, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Balasubramanian Arumugam Jr., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunday-Nweke Nneka Alice, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bangladesh’s Transition from the Least Developed Country: Navigating Export Challenges in a New Era

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Haritha Paul, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

(2) Roksolana Zapotichna, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine.

(3) P. Govindan, K.S. Rangasamay College of Arts and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anshu Chauhan, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(2) Muhammad Shobur, Pamulang University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haritha Paul, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roksolana Zapotichna, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Govindan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Intra Peritoneal Migration of an Intrauterine Device: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Said Haddadi, Algeria.

(2) Bharath Kumar Bhat, India.

(3) Naif Hakami, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Said Haddadi, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bharath Kumar Bhat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Naif Hakami, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Organic Spices Farming in West Districts, Zanzibar: It’s Contribution to income of Smallholder Farmers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Alka Parikh, India.

(2) Mrinal Choudhury, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(3) Gayathri Devi S.S, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shaikh Shamser Ali, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alka Parikh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mrinal Choudhury, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gayathri Devi S.S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nano Nitrogen and Chelated Zinc Foliar Spray on Growth and Yield Attributes of Guava (Psidium guajava L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrinal Choudhury, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Belagrouz Abdenour, Algeria.

(3) Pradyot Kumar Nayak, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avtar Singh Bimbraw, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrinal Choudhury,India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Belagrouz Abdenour, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pradyot Kumar Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Biofertilizers and Phosphorus Application on Growth of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

(2) Prof. Levent SON levent, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sreeja Bopin, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Shanu Khandelval, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sreeja Bopin, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shanu Khandelval, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Self-Breast Examination: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Female Students in a Senior High School Setting, Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Amatu, Chinwe Uchechukwu, Madonna University Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Akhaine Jesu-oboh Precious, Ambrose Ali University Ekpoma Edo State, Nigeria.

(3) Nguyen Minh Trung, Viet Nam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gbonjubola Owolabi, Oyo State College of Nursing Sciences, Nigeria.

(2) Gülay Ekinci, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amatu, Chinwe Uchechukwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akhaine Jesu-oboh Precious, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nguyen Minh Trung, Viet Nam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Market Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation and Their Impacts on the MFI Performance: The Mediating Role of Learning Orientation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, UP, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Efigenio R. Mendoza, ST. Anne College Lucena INC., Philippines.

(2) Rakan Alsarayreh, Jordan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Efigenio R. Mendoza, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rakan Alsarayreh, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA