Peer Review History: Influence of different species of fish on physicochemical properties of surimi

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Deepika, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, India.

(2) J. M. Koli, DBSKKV, India.

(3) Rosmawati, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akshay R. Akhade, Dr. B.S.K.K.V., India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Deepika, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. M. Koli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rosmawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustainable Indoor Farming: Integrating IoT and Data-driven Strategies to Optimize Hydroponic Crop Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aydin Unay, University of Aydin Adnan Menderes, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalil Azha Mohd Annuar, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.

(2) Anil Kumar Chikatimarla, A.G. & S.G. Siddhartha Degree College Of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mhemalatha, Sree Rama Engineering College, India.

(2) Oluwatosin Omotola Ajayi, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.

(3) Valluru Naga Venkata Nadh, India.

(4) Yogesh Shaniware, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalil Azha Mohd Annuar, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil Kumar Chikatimarla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Challenges of Cultural Diversity Regarding the Use of Smart Technology to Promote Sustainable Land Governance, Administration and Management in Liberia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Associate Professor, Pitesti University Center, Politehnica București National University for Science and Technology, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Quegas Mutale, National University of Science and Technology, Zimbabwe.

(2) Sahadev Gautam, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(3) Stephen Chinedu CHIOKE, Legacy University, Nigeria.

(4) Uchechi Chinazom Ekejiuba, Nile University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jerry Idah Odeh, Benue State University, Nigeria.

(2) Victor Augusto Bosquilia Abade, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Quegas Mutale, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sahadev Gautam, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Stephen Chinedu CHIOKE, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Uchechi Chinazom Ekejiuba, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of Two Hypofractionated Palliative Radiotherapy Schedules-24Gy in 4 Fractions vs 30Gy in 10 Fractions in Stage IVA and IVB Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head-neck Region

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Megha Tiwari, Naraina Vidyapeeth Group of Institutions, India.

(2) Gautam Vydia, Cancer Institute (WIA), India.

(3) Irfan Rasool Gadda, Government Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Megha Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gautam Vydia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Irfan Rasool Gadda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Compost Levels on Soil Properties and Growth Performance of Okra

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Oluro, Christopher .O, Federal College of Horticulture Dadin-Kowa, Nigeria.

(2) Pawan Devkota, Texas Tech University, USA.

(3) Ghassan Jayed Zaidan, College of Agriculture, Tikrit University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Esiosa Adewale, University of Louisville, USA.

(2) Joseph, Paul Omaye, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Nigeria.

(3) Mehdi Dahmardeh, University of Zabol, Iran.

(4) Okunade, Racheal Funke, Federal college of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Research and Training Moor Plantation, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.23/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oluro, Christopher .O, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pawan Devkota, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ghassan Jayed Zaidan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review of the Ford-fulkerson Algorithm for Network Flow Problems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Zuber, Associate Professor, Scope Global Skills University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Manikandan Sridharan, E.G.S Pillay Engineering College, India.

(2) M. Kanchana, Vellore Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Ebtehal Akeel Hamed, Al Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mona M. Gothi, India.

(2) VinodVeeramachaneni, Colorado Christian University, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manikandan Sridharan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Kanchana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ebtehal Akeel Hamed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Deep Learning Techniques for Threat Detection in Cloud Environments: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Reddy Saisindhutheja, Vardhaman College of Engineering, India.

(2) Aws Hamed Hamad, Iraq.

(3) Aswathy RH, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Imran Mirza, Poornima University, India.

(2) Awodele Simon Olufikayo, Nigeria.

(3) Kiran Dodiya, Gujarat University, India.

(4) Ravi Kumar Vankayalapati, USA.

(5) Srinivas Kalisetty, Texas.

(6) Venkata Sai Swaroop Reddy, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Reddy Saisindhutheja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aws Hamed Hamad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aswathy RH, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Innovative Statistical Modelling of Exchange Rates and Agricultural Sector Performance in Nigeria: The Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressive Modelling

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hounaida Daly, Hail University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Morteza Majidian, University of Tehran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hounaida Daly, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Morteza Majidian, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Long-memory Dynamics in Nigerian Commercial Banks’ Lending Rates: A Comparative Analysis of ARIMA, ARFIMA, and FIGARCH Models

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Albert Kiptanui Cheruiyot, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

(2) Owolabi Adesegun (ACIB), The Federal Polytechnic Ado, Nigeria.

(3) Syrine Ben Romdhane, University of Tunis – Higher Institute of Management of Tunis, Tunisia.

(4) Nadia Dridi, High School of Economics and Commerce of Tunis, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Albert Kiptanui Cheruiyot, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Owolabi Adesegun (ACIB), Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Syrine Ben Romdhane, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nadia Dridi, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modelling Interest Rate Return in Nigeria: The Asymmetric Power Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Vitaliy Makohon, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

(2) Sebastian Kaweto Kalovwe, Strathmore Institute of Mathematical Sciences (SIMS), Strathmore University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aman Shreevastava, Purnea University, India.

(2) Nuhu Musa, Kogi State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vitaliy Makohon, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sebastian Kaweto Kalovwe, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA