Peer Review History: Cotton and Soybean Based Risk Resilient Intercropping Systems for Rainfed Black Soils of Akola District of Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Shekhar Kapoor, Govind Guru Tribal University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bernard Yumbya, Kenya.

(2) Badal Verma, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gangadhara Doggalli, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Rabefiraisana Harimialimalala Jhonny, University of Antananarivo, Madagascar.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bernard Yumbya, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Badal Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Influencing the Deterioration of Groundnut Seed Quality and Its Implications on Storage Capacity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Satish Bhagwatrao Aher, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, India.

(2) Iancu Paula, University of Craiova, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arun Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Kaushik Pramanik, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(3) Ragupathi K P, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satish Bhagwatrao Aher, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iancu Paula, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of NPK on Onion (Allium cepa L.) Yield

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Melkamu Hinsermu Dufera, Ethiopian Institutes of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Ethiopia.

(2) A.A Kawade, Shri Vaishnav Institute of Agriculture, SVVV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jawdat Bakr, Sulaimani Polytechnic University SPU, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Melkamu Hinsermu Dufera, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A.A Kawade, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Drought Tolerance Through Biomass and Physiological Traits in Modern and Spelt Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahfoozullah Lateif, Baghlan University, Afghanistan.

(2) Ramesh Babu Rijal, Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC), Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Waqar Nasir, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahfoozullah Lateif, Afghanistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramesh Babu Rijal, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Level of Nano Urea on Growth of Strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa) cv. Winter Dawn, under Prayagraj Agro Climatic Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Uma Kant Singh, Bihar Forestry College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Namita Bisht, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Uma Kant Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Namita Bisht, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrating Nutrient Management with Conservation Agriculture Practices for Mint Crop Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Senior Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Laxman Navi, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, India.

(2) Husam Mohammed Muhi, University of Diyala, College of Agriculture, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Laxman Navi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Husam Mohammed Muhi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Green Solvents for Sustainable Pigment Extraction from Floral Sources

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Milad Edraki, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Mrunali Patel, Ganpat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. P. Gowsalya Devi, The Standard Fireworks Rajaratnam College for Women, India.

(2) Mrunali Patel , Ganpat University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Milad Edraki, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mrunali Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on Protected Cultivation of Horticultural Crops: Advances and Sustainability

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Shekhar Kapoor, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kukuh Setiawan, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) K. Selvarani, School of Agriculture and Horticulture, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pushpa Kumari, Nalanda College of Horticulture, India.

(2) Sukhjinder Singh, CSIR-IHBT Palampur, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kukuh Setiawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Selvarani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Intra-Household Gender Dynamics on Household Vulnerability to Climate Change: Empirical Evidence from Tripura State of North-East India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.
President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepika Singh, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Fredrick Kayusi, Maasai Mara University, Kenya.

(3) Fasakin I. J, University of Ibadan and International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nigeria.

(4) Shafaatu Bello Habib, Saadatu Rimi University of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hurgesa Hundera , Arsi University, Ethiopia.

(2) Reshmi S, MES Asmabi College, Kodungallur, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepika Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fredrick Kayusi, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fasakin I. J, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Shafaatu Bello Habib, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on Edible Flowers: The Sustainable Solution for Food Security and Nutrition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Head of the Pediatric Surgery Service, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Konar, Seacom Skills University, India.

(2) Nidhi Mittal, GGDSD College affiliation Panjab University, India.

(3) Bobby Prasad, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tara Devi Sen, Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek Konar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nidhi Mittal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bobby Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA