Peer Review History: Using Sentinel 1A (SAR) and Sentinel 2 Data for Assessing Water Spread Dynamics and Crop Diversification in Lower Palar Sub Basin, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shashikant Verma, National Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Widodo Brontowiyono, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hassane Bassirou, University of Lomé, Togo.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shashikant Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Widodo Brontowiyono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Detection and Identification of Tomato leaf curl New Delhi Virus Associated with Mosaic Disease of Luffa aegyptiaca and Coccinia grandis from Central India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim O. Farah, College of Science Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ananya, College of Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, India.

(2) Kirpa Ram, Baba Mastnath University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ananya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kirpa Ram, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determining the Effect of Biofertilizer and Phosphorus on Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Nowembabazi Anna, Makerere University, Uganda.

(2) Muhammad Shafiq, Karachi University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nowembabazi Anna, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Shafiq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Association of Socio-Economic Factors with Knowledge of Eco-Friendly Farming Practices among Vegetable Growers in Madhya Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Pallavi Deokate, College of Agriculture, VNMKV, India.

(2) Prashant Shrivastava, Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University, India.

(3) Utpal Barman, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bello RS, Federal College of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(2) TJ Nesengani, University of Limpopo, Republic of South Africa.

(3) Udokang, Anietie Edem, The Federal Polytechnic Offa, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pallavi Deokate, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prashant Shrivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Utpal Barman, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Foliar Application of Nutrients and Plant Growth Regulators on Growth, Yield, and Profitability of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Asam Raza, University of Gujrat, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) A. P. Gowsalya Devi, The Standard Fireworks Rajaratnam College for Women, India.

(2) Garima Pathak, B.D.College, Patliputra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. P. Gowsalya Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Garima Pathak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Inorganic Fertilizer, Vermicompost and Biofertilizer on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kalavati Prajapati, Shri. P.H.G. Muni. Arts and Science College, India.

(2) Ghada Sasi, School of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muazaz Azeez Hasan Al-Hadeethi, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Ibn Al- Haitham, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kalavati Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghada Sasi, UK) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Depression and Chronic Kidney Disease: Risk Factors and Predictors in Nigerian Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Monique Lynch-Jonah, The University of the West Indies, Jamaica.

(2) A. K. M Shahidur Rahman, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Annapurna Gupta, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, College, Veer Kunwar  Singh University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monique Lynch-Jonah, Jamaica) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. K. M Shahidur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unmasking the Unexpected: A Case of Acute Pulmonary Edema in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Akande Blessing Atendikongye, Army Command and Naowa hospital, Nigeria.

(2) Nirmal J Kaur, Columbia University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Giuseppe Gullace, Italy.

(2) Jurandyr Santos Nogueira, Polytechnic School – Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

(3) Rabi Taj, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akande Blessing Atendikongye, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nirmal J Kaur, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Different Post-emergence Herbicide Mixtures on the Physiological Traits and Yield of Irrigated Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). in Madhya Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Madahb Kumar Datta, Sri Sri University, India.

(2) Avimanyu Palit, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) E.Aruna, ANGRAU, India.

(2) Nagarjun P, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Madahb Kumar Datta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Avimanyu Palit, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Probing on Interactions of Proteins with Phenolic Compounds in the East African Highland Banana Pulp at Different Stages of Banana Juice Extraction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fidanka Trajkova, Associate Professor, Goce Delcev University of Stip, Macedonia.

Reviewers:

(1) E. Vadivel, Dnyanaprasarak Mandal’s College and Research Centre, India.

(2) Priscilla Kini, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Charles Umenwa, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (E. Vadivel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priscilla Kini, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA