Peer Review History: In vitro Multiple Shoot Induction and Plant Regeneration from Single-node Cuttings of Jasminum azoricum L.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Cinthya Christopher, All Saints’ College, University of Kerala, India.

(2) Md. Zahidur Rahman, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(3) Sewgil Saaduldeen Anwer, Tishk International University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cinthya Christopher, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md. Zahidur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sewgil Saaduldeen Anwer, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spatial Analysis of Gully Erosion Patterns and Community Impact in Kaduna South, Kaduna State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

(2) Prof. Mustafa Turkmen, Giresun University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Salami Hafiz, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

(2) Guma, Edward Pishikeni, Kogi State Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salami Hafiz, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Guma, Edward Pishikeni, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic evaluation of alternative crops and cropping systems for sugarcane under Northern Transition Zone of Karnataka

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Saba, King AbdulAziz University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Girish Chavadappanavar, JSS Banashankari Arts,Commerce,and S.K.Gubbi Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Saba, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Girish Chavadappanavar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence, Molecular Characterization And Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) Strains Associated with Pediatric Diarrhoea in Abuja, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fuyong Jiao, Children’s Hospital of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital ( S P P H ), Xi,an, China.

(2) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaimaa Obaid Hasson, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Mukhtar.M.F. Abushaala, Libya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaimaa Obaid Hasson, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mukhtar.M.F. Abushaala, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | J CH FROM AJPR TO IRJGH | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence and Digital Therapy for Adolescent Mental Health in the UK: Opportunities, Barriers and Ethical Consideration

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Kiran Kumar Reddy, Rajeev Gandhi Memorial College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Nagaraj Kamath, RGUHS, India.

(3) Aruna Priyadharshni Subramanian, MKU, India.

(4) Mohammad Abdurrahman Khan, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Davood Hassanvand, Kerman University Of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) R. Jayasree, PSGR Krishnammal College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Kiran Kumar Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nagaraj Kamath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aruna Priyadharshni Subramanian, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mohammad Abdurrahman Khan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study on Seasonal Zooplankton Diversity in Two Urban Reservoirs of Warangal District, Telangana, India.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) AbdAllah Tharwat Abdelkhalik, Egypt.

(2) Punit Saraswat, India.

(3) Rodica David, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elouahli Allaa, Scientific Institute, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (AbdAllah Tharwat Abdelkhalik, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Punit Saraswat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rodica David, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Acacia mangium Based Agroforestry Systems on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research , India.

Reviewers:

(1) Abu Feyisa Dejenu, Ethiopia.

(2) Mamadou Baba Konate, University of Segou, Mali.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajayi, Oyinlola Arike, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abu Feyisa Dejenu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mamadou Baba Konate, Mali) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of different seed priming techniques on growth, flowering and seed attributes in balsam (Impatiens balsamina)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research , India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Pandey, India.

(2) Prativa Anand, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Borozan Aurica, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I”, Romania.

(2) Ratna Dewi Eskundari, Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prativa Anand, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design and Development of Low-Cost Active Battery Balancing Technique for Electric Motorcycles

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.

Reviewers:

(1) I Gede Suputra Widharma, State Polytechnic of Bali, Indonesia.

(2) Gouthami Eragamreddy, G. Narayanamma Institute of Technology and Science (For Women), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K Chenchi Reddy, Geethanjali College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (I Gede Suputra Widharma, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gouthami Eragamreddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Proposal of a Convolutional Neural Network Based Prediction Model for Prostate Cancer from MRI

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Sheng Zhang ,Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Muktevi Srivenkatesh , Gitam Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Abdul Rahman H Ali, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Tanishka Hira, Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muktevi Srivenkatesh , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdul Rahman H Ali, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tanishka Hira, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA