Author Archive: admin

Peer Review History: Process Optimization for Development of Extruded Snack from Brown Rice-Amaranth-Moringa Seed Powder Blend

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ola-Adedoyin, Abimbola Theresa, Nigeria Natural Medicine Development Agency, Nigeria.

(2) Ankur Aggarwal, BHU, India.

(3) Dipali Saxena, Centre for Food Technology, Jiwaji University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandrahas Sahu, College of Dairy Science and Food Technology, DSVCKV, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ola-Adedoyin, Abimbola Theresa, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ankur Aggarwal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dipali Saxena, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Relationship between Smartphone Addiction and Sleeping Disorder among Senior High School Students

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) James Robert S, Christ University, India.

(2) Bindiya Tater, Medicaps University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mayur sherkhane , SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, India.

(2) Burcu DAYSAL GÜLER, Hittite University, Turkey.

(3) Hifizah Nur, Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia.

(4) Pairoj Boonluksiri, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (James Robert S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bindiya Tater, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Bridging Gaps in Cybersecurity Governance: Leveraging Collaborative Digital Solutions

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Mohd Zuber, Associate Professor, Scope Global Skills University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinay Kumar Singh, Amity University, India.

(2) Monica Barbu, National Institute for Research and Development in Informatics, Romania.

(3) Syed Arif Islam, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.06/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinay Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monica Barbu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Syed Arif Islam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Strategies Employed in the Implementation of the Bachelor of Education Social Studies Curriculum in Colleges of Education of Ghana

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Anik Widiastui, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

(2) Lok Wai Foong, Teacher Education Institute, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anik Widiastui, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lok Wai Foong, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: CHALLENGES OF KINDERGARTEN TEACHERS IN THE NEW NORMAL: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem Altun Ekiz, Associate Professor, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nureyzwan Sabani, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia.

(2) Koustav Kundu, Acharya Brojendra Nath Seal College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alfi Rohmatul Azizah, Haqqi Internasional Edukasi Foundation, Indonesia.

(2) Guo Xiao, Sultan Idris Education University, China.

(3) Kurmanbek Yerkezhan, Al Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nureyzwan Sabani, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Koustav Kundu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Late Aortic Dissection Post-Bentall in an Inoperable Patient: Case Report and Clinical Lessons

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abha Chandra, Dean, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Integral University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Palanki Surya Satyagopal, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Salahuddin Rahaman, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bangladesh.

(3) Sergii Siromakha, National Amosov Institute of Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Ukraine.

(4) Uberto Bortolotti, University of Pisa, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Palanki Surya Satyagopal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salahuddin Rahaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sergii Siromakha, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Uberto Bortolotti, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: REVERSE MIGRATION DURING COVID 19 PANDEMIC: A REVIEW OF GOVERNMENT POLICIES

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aditi R Khandelwal, Associate Professor, IIS (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

(3) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei”  University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Arbind Chaudhary, Nepal.

(2) Samit Mahore, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, India.

(3) Anuja Sharma, Amity University, India.

(4) Arup Mitra, South Asian University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arbind Chaudhary, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samit Mahore, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anuja Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arup Mitra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Using TOGAF for Migration of Monolith Systems to Microservices

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Neha Munjal, Assistant Professor, School of Physical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Prof. Lamsoudi Redouane, Regional Center for Education and Training Professions Casablanca- Settat, El Jadida Provincial Section, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Kumar Vankayalapati, USA.

(2) M. Bhuvaneswari, Jayaprakash Narayan College of Engineering, India.

(3) Mahesh Kumar Bagwani, RGPV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Kumar Dass, NIST University, India.

(2) Chandrashekar Pandugula, USA.

(3) Laxminarayana Korada, United States.

(4) Nupura Torvekar, India.

(5) Savio Dmello, USA.

(6) Shikha Singh, Dev Bhoomi Uttrakhand University, India.

(7) Vamsi K, WSU, USA.

(8) Venkata Krishna Azith Teja Ganti, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Kumar Vankayalapati, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Bhuvaneswari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahesh Kumar Bagwani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Role of Micronutrients in Immune Function and Health: Insights from Healthcare Professionals on Multivitamin-Multimineral Supplementation

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajendra Singh Rajput, Mumbai University, India.

(2) Mohammed Noori Salman, Jabir Ibn Hayyan Medical University for Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

(3) Petre Lacramioara, “Francisc I. Rainer” Institute of Anthropology, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Susan Aj. Holdbrooke, Nigerian Institute Of Medical Research, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajendra Singh Rajput, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Noori Salman, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Petre Lacramioara, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: COMPARATIVE STUDY ON ANTIMICROBIAL AND PHYTOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT POLAR FRACTIONS OF Anogeisuss leiocarpus ROOT EXTRACT FROM LANGTANG LGA, PLATEAU STATE.

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung Cheal Moon, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Industrial Technology Support Division, Changwon, Republic of Korea.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, India.

(2) Wan Zuraida Wan Mohd Zain, School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jitendra Kumar Chaurasia, Dr. A P J Abdul kalam Technical University, India.

(2) Eseoghene Okpako, Niger Delta University, Nigeria.

(3) Tatini Debnath, MAKAUT, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhananjay Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wan Zuraida Wan Mohd Zain, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA