Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Stephen Alaba John, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

(2) Better Jack, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(3) Soma Dhar, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Stephen Alaba John, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Better Jack, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Soma Dhar, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Leenshya GUNNOO, University of Technology Mauritius, Mauritius.

(2) Ashraful Alam, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Leenshya GUNNOO, Mauritius) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashraful Alam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Amr M.K. Mahrous, El Saleheya El Gadida University, Egypt.

(2) Ashish Sarkar, Moridhal College, India.

(3) Abeer Elmetwally, Animal Reproduction Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.07/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amr M.K. Mahrous, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abeer Elmetwally, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hagar Fathy Saad Abdelatif Mohamed Forsan, Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) A. Ayeshamariam, Bharathidasan University, India.

(3) Asieh Akhoondi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(4) Megha K. Kothawade, Guru Gobind Singh College of Engineering & Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hagar Fathy Saad Abdelatif Mohamed Forsan, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Ayeshamariam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Asieh Akhoondi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Megha K. Kothawade, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Olawepo Taiye Femi, Kwara State College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Anjali Kumari, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olawepo Taiye Femi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anjali Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kale Bala Nirmala, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Jhoseline Stayce Guillen Sanchez, Cesar Vallejo University, Peru.

(3) Ravina Parmar, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kale Bala Nirmala, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jhoseline Stayce Guillen Sanchez, Peru) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ravina Parmar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Ogboenyie Goodluck Chibunna, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(2) Huda Suhail. Abid. Al-Hayanni, College of Science for Women, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ogboenyie Goodluck Chibunna, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Huda Suhail. Abid. Al-Hayanni, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayaz Ahmad, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Sandeep Kumar, Akal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayaz Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sandeep Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, Assistant Professor, RV College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Masroor Anwar, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.

(2) B.V. RamaKrishna, Vignan Institute of Technology and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syed Masroor Anwar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B.V. RamaKrishna, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan INCE, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Hediye Dagdeviren, Istanbul Aydin University, Turkey.

(2) Ujwala Bhanarkar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hediye Dagdeviren, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ujwala Bhanarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA