Author Archive: admin

Peer Review History: Socio-demographic predictors of Knowledge, attitude and practice of proper refuse disposal methods among People of Isoko South in Delta State

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Olanrewaju John Adedayo, Lead City University, Nigeria.

(2) Naibin George, University of Latvia, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Danellie C. Llamas, College of Business Administration, University of the Cordilleras, Philippines.

(2) Dirk Diestro, Capiz State University, Philippines.

(3) Ikona, Eteng Lekam Eteng, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olanrewaju John Adedayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naibin George, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Self- management practices among diabetic patients: A concept Analysis

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkha Devi, Sikkim Maniapl college of Nursing, India.

(2) Dr. Malar Kodi S, All India Institutes Of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ne Win, University of Public Health, Myanmar.

(2) Noraishah Mohamed Nor, IIUM, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nur Aifiah Binti Ibrahim, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

(2) Roopa Kv, Sri Sri College Of Ayurvedic Science And Research, India.

(3) Shakir Ullah, Institute of Botany, Chinese academy of science, China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ne Win, Myanmar) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noraishah Mohamed Nor, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: An Empirical Analysis of Mobile Payment Service and Customers’ Behaviours in South-South Geopolitical Zone of Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Meet Bhatt, Sardar Vallabhbhai Global University, India.

(2) Mark Anthony L. Pelegrin, Adamson University, Philippines.

(3) Murali Malempati, USA.

(4) M. Deepa, Nallamuthu Gounder Mahalingam College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.32/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meet Bhatt, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mark Anthony L. Pelegrin, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Murali Malempati, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (M. Deepa, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Hybrid LSTM-DCC Model for Multivariate Cryptocurrency Volatility Prediction

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ovi Talukder, SEC, SUST, Bangladesh.

(2) Pappula Ashok, Anurag University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kavitha A Karkera, Nagarjuna Degree College, India.

(2) Krishna Murthy Inumula, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), India.

(3) Lalu P. George, SCMS School of Technology and Management, India.

(4) Mahmood Subhy Mahmood, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(5) Nay Myo Htun, Mangalore University, India.

(6) Oluwatomisin Arokodare, Georgia Southern University, United States.

(7) Sebastian Kaweto Kalovwe, Strathmore University, Kenya.

(8) Soumyashree N Hegde, KLES JG college of commerce, India.

(9) Thien Anh Nguyen Bui, John von Neumann Institute – VNU HCM, Vietnam.

(10) Vishalkumar Langaliya, SSR College of Arts, Commerce and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ovi Talukder, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pappula Ashok, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Generalized Almost Unbiased Estimator of Finite Population Variance under Stratified Random Sampling

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Nirupama Sahoo, Gangadhar Meher University, India.

(2) Chandni Kumari, University Of Lucknow, India.

(3) Okafor, Ikechukwu Boniface, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anamika Kumari, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.

(2) E I Abdul Sathar, University of Kerala, India.

(3) Jamiu Olasunkanmi Muili, Skyline University Nigeria, Nigeria.

(4) Suleiman Haruna, Niger State Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nirupama Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chandni Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Okafor, Ikechukwu Boniface, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Garlic Acid and GABRB3 gene Role in Epileptic Seizure Manifestation

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Anna University, India.

(2) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Hamid Karrar Alsharif, School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, USA.

(2) Chaithra G G, RGUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alexander G. Dimitrov, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.

(2) Rakesh R. Tiwari, K. G. Mittal Ayurved College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Hamid Karrar Alsharif, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chaithra G G, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Stock Assessment of Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus (Lacépède, 1803) from the Buyo Hydroelectric Reservoir Bordering Taï National Park (Côte d’Ivoire)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Desimira STROE, Institute of Research and Development for Aquatic Ecology, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Romania.

(2) Seher Dirican, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Desimira STROE, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seher Dirican, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Feeding Pattern of the Purple-spotted Bigeye (Priacanthus tayenus Ricardson, 1846) Based on Otolith Analysis in the Makassar Strait, Indonesia

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Traczyk Ryszard, Poland.

(2) Santiago Morawicki, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Traczyk Ryszard, Poland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Santiago Morawicki, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Evaluation of Pattern of Antibiotics Utilization among Fish farmers and Detection of Tetracycline, Oxytetracycline and Ceftriaxone residue in Fish Samples in Lagos, Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjib Saha, Vidyasagar College for Women, India.

(2) Shristi Aich, Kristu Jayanti College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ameilia Zuliyanti Sieegar, University of Sumatera Utara, Indonesian.

(2) Avik Bhanja, Vidyasagar University, India.

(3) S.Manickavasagam, Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Nagapattinam, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjib Saha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shristi Aich, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA