Peer Review History: Supervised Machine Learning Models for COVID-19 Prediction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Cirruse Salehnasab, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Egwom Onyinyechi Jessica, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

(3) Nitalaksheswara Rao Kolukula, GITAM University Visakhapatnam, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Milind Ankleshwar, India.

(2) Nitin Goyal, School of Engineering and Technology Central University of Haryana, India.

(3) Parakramaweera Sunil Dharmapala, U.S.A.

(4) Sunil Kumar, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.05/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cirruse Salehnasab, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Egwom Onyinyechi Jessica, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nitalaksheswara Rao Kolukula, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Expectation of Freshman Retention Rate at University of Guam Based on Data Analysis: A Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Qing-Wen Wang, Department of Mathematics, Shanghai University, P.R. China.

(2) Prof. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Anisur Rahman, Hajigonj Degree College, Chandpur, Bangladesh.

(2) MAICHIKI, Isaac Peter, Nigeria.

(3) Radheshyam H. Gajghat, Sandip Institute of Technology & Research Centre, Nashik, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.25/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Radheshyam H. Gajghat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (MAICHIKI, Isaac Peter, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anisur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Stressors on Academic Performance: A Case Study of Business Students in Karachi

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Gökhan Duman, Gazi University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Resmy Raj A, SDM Institute of Ayurveda and Hospital, India.

(2) Ernest Boateng, Ghana.

(3) Mangalam Kumari, Sharda University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Touil Driss, Higher Institute of Nursing and Health Techniques, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Resmy Raj A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ernest Boateng, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mangalam Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Epidemiological Studies on Staphylococcal Otitis in Dogs at Jabalpur, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Valerii Ushkalov, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

(2) Matheus Garcia Lopes, Uniube Veterinary Hospital – Preceptorship, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aisha Abubakar Jibril, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.

(2) Mykola Zhelavskyi, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine.

(3) R.P.Diwakar, Acharya Deva University of Ag.&Tech, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Valerii Ushkalov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Matheus Garcia Lopes, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Stature and Sex Estimation Using Anthropometric Parameters in the Yoruba Ethnic Group of Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maged Refaat, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Jagriti Agrawal, Pt. J.N.M. Medical College, India.

(2) Vineeta Saini, SGT University, India.

(3) Netra Kumar Ojha, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jagriti Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vineeta Saini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Netra Kumar Ojha, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Constraints to Women Participation in Agricultural Grant Funded by SEEFOR in Delta and Rivers States, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Onyegbula Akudo Francilia, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute, Nigeria.

(2) Prameela S. Shetty, India.

(3) Minakshi Kandari, Mumbai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shivansu Sachan, CSJM University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Onyegbula Akudo Francilia, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prameela S. Shetty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Minakshi Kandari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Well Water Sources on Performance of Laying Hens in Ile-Oluji of Ondo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Aliakbar Salari, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

(2) Masse Diomande, Jean Lorougnon Guede University, Côte d’Ivoire.

(3) Kazi Abdus Sobur, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ankit Sharma, School of Veterinary Sciences, Abhilashi University, India.

(2) Raafat Khidr, Egypt.

(3) Jonatan Mikhail Del Solar Velarde, Federal University Of Sergipe, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aliakbar Salari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Masse Diomande, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kazi Abdus Sobur, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytosociological Studies on Arboreal Plant Species in Ramshehar Range of Nalagarh Forest Division, Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University,  Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manisha Pandey, D.A.V (P.G.) College Dehradun Uttarakhand, India.

(2) Hazrat Ali, University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Archana Meena, India.

(2) Mbog Mbog Severin, National Advanced School of Engineering, University of Douala, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manisha Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hazrat Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In silico Investigation of the Anti-inflammatory Potential of Ligands from Commonly Used Spices, Herbs and Medicinal Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Naseem A. Qureshi, Assistant Professor, Al-Falah University, India.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Neda Shaghaghi, Razi University, Iran.

(2) R. Suresh, National Institute of Siddha, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B Abarna, National Institute of Siddha, India.

(2) V.M.Karthic, The TN DR MGR Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neda Shaghaghi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Outcomes of Planned Cesarean Hysterectomy and Conservative Management in Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Narrative Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Darko Nozic, Military Medical Academy, General Hospital Acibadem Belmedic Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Avishek Bhadra, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Pedro Viana Pinto, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avishek Bhadra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pedro Viana Pinto, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA