Peer Review History: Labor Analgesia and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: Balancing Benefits, Risks, and Unresolved Questions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veeramuthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Md.Mostafijur Rahaman, Institute of Child and Mother Health, Bangladesh.

(2) Ferydoon Khamooshi, University of Zabol, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md.Mostafijur Rahaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ferydoon Khamooshi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rate of Coccidiosis in Chicken Farms in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, UCLA School of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Maryam Arshad, BZU, Pakistan.

(2) Kennedy O. Ogolla, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khaled Mohamed El-Dakhly, Beni-Suef University, Egypt.

(2) Nelson Correa Herrera, University of Ciego de Avila Maximo Gomez Baez, Cuba.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maryam Arshad, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kennedy O. Ogolla, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Review on the Status and Geographical Distribution of Invasive Alien Plant Species in Bhutan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Assistant Professor, Research Center and Post Graduate, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sachin Sharma, D.A.V. (P.G.) College, India.

(2) Abdulkadir Mohammed, Mattu University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Umakant B. Deshmukh, Janata Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sachin Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdulkadir Mohammed, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Numerical Simulation and Evaluation of Y2S3 and Y2TeS2 on Structural, Stability, and Electronic Properties for Photocatalytic Water Splitting Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nyoman Puspa Asri, Universitas Ciputra Surabaya, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh B. Shelar, D. Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) R. B. Bhise, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asieh Akhoondi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Kakali Sarkar, Vidya Vihar Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Kazi Mamunur Rahman Rifat, Bangladesh.

(4) Majid Ali, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahesh B. Shelar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. B. Bhise, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Addressing Diet-related Non-communicable Diseases in Ghana: Nutritional Knowledge and Cooking Practices of Fast-food Vendors in Kumasi Metropolis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Leonard Chakauya, South Africa.

(2) Soeb Md. Shoayeb Noman, Uttara University, Bangladesh.

(3) Peter Babajide Oloba, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sumbul Zehra, Galgotias University, K.M. Govt. Girls P.G. College, India.

(2) Yersi Luis Huamán Romanó, Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios, Perú.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Leonard Chakauya, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soeb Md. Shoayeb Noman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Peter Babajide Oloba, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: OptiFlexSort: A Hybrid Sorting Algorithm for Efficient Large-Scale Data Processing

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rohit Rastogi, Associate Professor, ABES Engineering College, Ghaziabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Manyol Moise, University of Douala, Cameroon.

(2) Onyemauche Uchenna Chinyere, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vishal Kumar, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) Bala Dhandayuthapani V, University of Technology and Applied Sciences – Shinas, Oman.

(3) Rakesh Kumar Sen, GITA Autonomous College, India.

(4) Uppin C V, Hensard Univesity, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manyol Moise, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Onyemauche Uchenna Chinyere, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Statistical Approach for Analysis of Trend Pattern of Pigeon Pea in India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mouayed A. Hussein, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Gaurab Luitel, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Nepal.

(2) Aiswarya G B, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sourakanti Sarkar, Seacom Skills University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gaurab Luitel, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aiswarya G B, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Survey of Major Insect Pests, Natural Enemies and Diseases of Brinjal in Tribal Belt of Surat District in Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) I. Paramasiva, Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Gessica Jacira Trindade de Souza, Federal University of Alagoas, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Kadir Salam, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (I. Paramasiva, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gessica Jacira Trindade de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge and Attitude towards Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation among Community Members in Selected Communities of Obio/Akpor Lga, Rivers State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Melba Sahaya Sweety, Enam Nursing College, Bangladesh.

(2) Ebrahim Aliafsari Mamaghani, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Melba Sahaya Sweety, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ebrahim Aliafsari Mamaghani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of Insecticides against Pod Fly (Melanagromyza obtusa) Infesting Pigeonpea

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Naziya P. Pathan, S. D. Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anu Nawhal, SHUATS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zainab Muhammad Muktar, Abdullahi Fodiyo University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naziya P. Pathan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anu Nawhal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA