Peer Review History: Regeneration of Embryogenic Cells and Haustorium-like Structures of Dua Xiem Xanh (Dwarf Green Xiem Coconut) Sourced from Go Cong, Vietnam

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

(2) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Selay Dogan, Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, Turkey.

(2) Israr Khan, University of Swat, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Selay Dogan, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Israr Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Implication of Poor Awareness of Sex Education on Teenagers in Udenu Local Government Area, Enugu State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Manju Choudhary, University of Rajasthan, India.

(2) Noorjan K S, RGUHS, India.

(3) Seema Bhakuni, Doon Institute of Management and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manju Choudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noorjan K S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Seema Bhakuni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Analysis of Green Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Farming in Bukit Biru Village, Tenggarong District, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Champa Lal Khatik, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Rajasthan, India.

(2) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Bipana Yogi, Himalayan College of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Nepal.

(2) Sushan Chowhan, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Bangladesh.

(3) Aman Verma, ANDUA&T, India.

(4) Suraj Dhakal, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bipana Yogi, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sushan Chowhan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aman Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Suraj Dhakal, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Recent Advances in Aptamer-based Detection and Therapeutics: Applications in Disease Detection, Biosensing and Targeted Drug Delivery

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jinxi Du, University at Albany, United States.

(2) Pratik Prasad Singh, IARI (Indian Agricultural Research Institute), India.

(3) Pronama Biswas, Dayananda Sagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jinxi Du, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratik Prasad Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pronama Biswas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Land Cover Changes and Fragmentation of Mining Landscape using Geospatial Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Siba Prasad Mishra, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamal Sami, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

(2) Priyadarshan Sham Ganvir, Mahatma Gandhi Arts, Science and Late N. P. Commerce College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kamal Sami, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priyadarshan Sham Ganvir, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Innovative Electrochemical Deposition Techniques for Durable Concrete Crack Repair

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. José Alberto Duarte Moller, University of Sonora, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Omveer Singh, Gautam Buddha University, India.

(3) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

(4) Dr. Shi-Hai Dong, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) M Preethi, Osmania University, India.

(2) Aditya Agrawal, Prestige Institute of Engineering Management & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M Preethi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aditya Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_4_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Nano Fertilizers and Varieties on Growth and Yield of Brinjal (Solanum melongena)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Jayashree Dey Sarkar, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) B.Subhash, Lovely Professional University Punjab, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jayashree Dey Sarkar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B.Subhash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Scale, Gender Diversity, and Financial Proficiency of University-Based Pension Funds in Kenya: The Influence of Board Structure on Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jain Jacob M, SRM Institute of Science & Technology, India.

(2) Muhammad Meraj, Mohammad Ali Jinnah University, Pakistan.

(3) Komal Sharma, Gujarat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jain Jacob M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Meraj, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Komal Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Analysis of Mango Cultivation in Lucknow District of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Muthulakshmi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Sourakanti Sarkar, Seacom Skills University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Muthulakshmi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sourakanti Sarkar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biological Control of Plant-parasitic Nematode through Avermectin: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Waswa Stanlous Juma, Kibabii University, Kenya.

(2) Sowmya K.L, Davangere University, India.

(3) J. Sailaja Rani, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waswa Stanlous Juma, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sowmya K.L, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (J. Sailaja Rani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA