Peer Review History: Morphometric Characterization and Hydrological Interpretation of the Shastri Watershed Using Geospatial Techniques

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Jai Prakash Koshale, India.

(2) Rajani Kant Awasthi, Sharda University Greater Noida, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) SAMA Daouda, Université de Lomé, Togo.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jai Prakash Koshale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajani Kant Awasthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Flooding on Food Security in Baringo County Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Abe Gilbert Ntoh, University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

(2) Ibrahim Umar Muhammad, Federal University Dutsin-ma, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Levi Situma Chepkania, Turkana University College, Kenya.

(2) Likhan Chandra Doley, Anthropological Survey of India, North Eastern Regional Centre Shillong (NERC), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abe Gilbert Ntoh, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ibrahim Umar Muhammad, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of D+3He and T+3He Reactions by Using Double Folding Potential at Astrophysical Relevant Energies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Magdy Rabie Soliman Sanad, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Egypt.

(2) Prof. Thomas F. George University of Missouri-St. Louis, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Muthucumaraswamy Rajamanickam , Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering ,India.

(2) M. B. Jessie Raj, Bishop Heber College, India.

(3) Nwori Augustine Nwode, Evangel University, Nigeria.

(4) Anuj Kumar, Mahamaya Government Degree College Sherkot, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Efrem Amanuel Data, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Hassan Tawakol Ahmed Fadol, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Sudan.

(3) Hedara Rachida, Abou Bakr Balkaid University, Algeria.

(4) Mohammed Shareef Mohammed,  Salah al-Din, Iraq.

(5) Ngaka John Nchejane, National University of Lesotho, Lesotho.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.125/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muthucumaraswamy Rajamanickam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. B. Jessie Raj India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nwori Augustine Nwode Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Anuj Kumar India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | J. CHANGE To PSIJ From IAARJ | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Predicting factors of migratory women workers in sugarcane harvesting

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Adeiza Ben Adinoyi, Texila American University, Nigeria.

(2) Ne Win, University of Public Health, Myanmar.

(3) P.Manimalathi, Sri Ramakrishna College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adeiza Ben Adinoyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ne Win, Myanmar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Manimalathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical Management of Infertility in a Doberman Bitch Associated with Vaginal Hyperplasia and Hypothyroidism

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Drazen Duricic , University of Zagreb, Croatia.

(2) Tibebu Hailesillassie Mamuye, Animal Health Institute, Ethiopia.

(3) G. Shalini, TANUVAS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Fathy Hassan Seioudy, Animal Production Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Dipanjan Chakraborty, CVSc and AH, India.

(3) G. Shalini, TANUVAS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Drazen Duricic, Croatia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tibebu Hailesillassie Mamuye, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (G. Shalini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Systematic Review of Multitarget Natural Products and Phytochemicals for Neurodegenerative Disease Therapy and Therapeutic Potentials

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tapanee Hongratanaworakit, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Arunkumar R, Kongunadu Arts and Science College, India.

(2) Togbossi Lucie Akouelevi, University of Lome, Togo.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hridoy Chakraborty, State Drugs Testing laboratory, India.

(2) Muskan Bhardwaj, IIMT University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arunkumar R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Togbossi Lucie Akouelevi, Togo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Minimally Age-Dependent Gut Microbial Signatures in Pancreatic Neoplasia Identified by qPCR Targeting the but Gene

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Essam Hussein Abdel-Shakour, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Renuka, Pingle Gove College for Women , India.

(2) V. Vishnu Raja, Srimad Andavan Arts and Science College , India.

(3) Sogandi, Fakultas Farmasi Universitas, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Renuka India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Vishnu Raja India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sogandi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Online Disinformation Detection through Text Analysis: A Comparative Study of Supervised Models with Hyperparameter Optimization

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdulkader Hajjouz, ITMO University, Russia.

(2) Insha Mirza, Institute for Excellence in Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdulkader Hajjouz, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Insha Mirza, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenges in Solar-Based Skill Development Programmes for Tribal Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Ladakh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chong Leong, Gan, Packaging Development Engineering, Micron Technology Inc., Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Peleowo Toheeb Kunle, Unilversity of Ilorin, Nigeria.

(2) Viresh Bhanudas Parkhe, Sir Visvesvaraya Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Sintayehu Assefa Yirga, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

(4) Jayashree Patole, Ramachandran International Institute of Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Auwalu Muazu, Nasarawa State University, Nigeria.

(2) William Mtonga, Zambia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Peleowo Toheeb Kunle, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Viresh Bhanudas Parkhe, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sintayehu Assefa Yirga, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jayashree Patole, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Uncertainty-Calibrated Decision Thresholds in Bayesian AI Systems: A Governance-Oriented Framework

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Reza Mahdiani, Canada.

(2) M. Rajasekar, SIAMTS University, India.

(3) Frederick Msiska, Malawi.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marwah Kamil Hussein, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Reza Mahdiani, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Rajasekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Frederick Msiska, Malawi) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA