Peer Review History: Evaluation of Formulated Suspension with Varying Concentrations of Pectin Derived from Mango (Mangifera indica Linn.) Peel and Acacia (Acacia Senegal L.) as Suspending Agents

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mindaugas Liaudanskas, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Lithuania.

(2) Dr. Vijaya Khader, Acharya N. G. Ranga agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shweta Bhandari, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Sameer M. Al-Gorany, Ninevah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shweta Bhandari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sameer M. Al-Gorany, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphological Characterization of Fungal Endophytes Isolated from the Leaves and Roots of Banana Plants (Musa sp.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) M.I.Zahir Hussain, Sadakathullah Appa College, India.

(2) U.Sivagamasundari, Kristu Jayanti College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.I.Zahir Hussain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (U.Sivagamasundari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Yield Gap Analysis of Maize in Different Agro-climatic Zones in Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Binoy Tripura, India.

(2) Mukesh Chand Goyal, Agriculture University, India.

(3) Himanshu Tripathi, R.S.M. College, M.J.P. Rohilkhand University, Bareilly, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.53/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Binoy Tripura, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mukesh Chand Goyal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Himanshu Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Survey on Prevalence of Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea in Prakasam District of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaikh Najiroddin Fakaroddin, Government College of Arts and Science, India.

(2) Prince Kumar Gupta, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaikh Najiroddin Fakaroddin, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prince Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity Analysis and Molecular Characterization of Pearl Millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] Hybrids/ Varieties

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Komal Shekhawat, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, India.

(2) Subhasmita Sahu, OUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Komal Shekhawat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subhasmita Sahu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Composting Efficiency: Thermophilic Lignocellulolytic Microbes for Bioconversion of Rice and Wheat Straw

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed Al-Keraway, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Deblina Roy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Jagadeesh U, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deblina Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jagadeesh U, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Foliar Application of Nano and Conventional Urea on Nitrogen Uptake and Use Efficiency in Ragi (Eleusine coracana)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivamurthy D, University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad, India.

(2) U. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Acharya N.G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivamurthy D, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (U. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Vegetable Ecosystem for Parasitoids of Lepidopteran Pests and Host Suitability of Predominant Parasitoid in Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Veterinary Medicine College, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Siti Noor Aishikin binti Abdul Hamid, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI), Malaysia.

(2) C. Muthu Lakshmi Bavithra, Tamil Nadu Agricultural Entomlogy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Siti Noor Aishikin binti Abdul Hamid, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C. Muthu Lakshmi Bavithra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Combinations of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Soil Health and Yield of Rice: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Suneel Kumar, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) S D R Vajra Hyndavi, ICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suneel Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S D R Vajra Hyndavi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mediation Analysis in Structural Equation Modeling (Sem): Theoretical Foundations, Statistical Methods and Practical Implications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Nurul Hidayana Mohd Noor, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia.

(2) Paul Agmabire Akendita, AAMUSTED, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nurul Hidayana Mohd Noor, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paul Agmabire Akendita, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA