Peer Review History: Integrated Nutrient Management for Sustainable Vegetable Production and Soil Health Improvement

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kumar Darjee, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

(2) Ahmed Elsayed Ahmed Maaty, Benha University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P.Gowsalya, Surya Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dilip Kumar Darjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Elsayed Ahmed Maaty, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Post-Harvest Losses in Horticultural Crops: Causes and Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Michael N.I. Lokuruka, Karatina University, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Daniela Cirnatu, Western University Vasile Goldis from Arad, Romania.

(2) Aly El Sheikha, University of Ottawa, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adewale Abidemi Aremu, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(2) Sisay Weldegebriel Zeweld, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Daniela Cirnatu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aly El Sheikha, Canada) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determination of Benzoic Acid Levels and pH in Commercial Herbal Decoctions Marketed in Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasan Ibrahim KOZAN, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey.

(2) P. Mary Anupama, St. Joseph’s College for Women (A), India.

(3) Beula Rani K R, Malankara Catholic College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayad Kadhim Fadhil, Iraq.

(2) Chanda Ranjan, The Oxford College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasan Ibrahim KOZAN, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Mary Anupama, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Beula Rani K R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical Composition and Functional Properties of Avocado and Dragon Fruit: A Comparative Evaluation of Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Neuroprotective Activities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, (Affiliated with H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar), India.

(2) Prof. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Meseret Zebeaman Birhanu, Debre Markos University, Ethiopia.

(2) Sakirigui Amoussatou, University of Technical Sciences, Engineering and Mathematics (UNSTIM), Benin.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sadia Kashif, Ziauddin University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meseret Zebeaman Birhanu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sakirigui Amoussatou, Benin) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Extended Legendre Wavelet Methods for Advanced Differential Equations

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Angelo Marcelo Tusset, Federal University of Technology , Brazil.

(2) Basavaraj Hoogar, Visvesvaraya Technological University , India.

(3) C.Saranyal, Cauvery College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anitha B.S, Raja Rajeswari College of Engineering (RRCE), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Angelo Marcelo Tusset, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Basavaraj Hoogar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (C.Saranyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pre-Service English Teachers’ Experiences in the Practicum: Opportunities and Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

(2) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepti Jain, Rani Durgawati University, India.

(2) Suleyman Kasap, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Turkey.

(3) Priyanka Jibhau Bachhav, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Benkhedda Mohammed, Algeria.

(2) Idowu, Olufemi, Lagos State University of Education, Nigeria.

(3) I Putu Andre Suhardiana, Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar, Indonesia.

(4) Mohammad Mahdi Kazemi, Persian Gulf University, Iran.

(5) Ruhit Bardhan, Indian Institute of Teacher Education, India.

(6) Thanakit Ouanhlee, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepti Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suleyman Kasap, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Priyanka Jibhau Bachhav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Toy-based Pedagogy for Holistic Development of Children in Early Childhood Care and Education: Teachers’ Perceptions and Implementation Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Raghab Jee Mishra, Central University of Punjab, India.

(2) Imran Khan, University of Engineering & Management , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Himan Jyoti Bora, Assam don Bosco University, India.

(2) Virendra Pratap Singh, NCERT, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raghab Jee Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imran Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating Social Media Platforms for Promotion of Maternal Health Awareness Among Women in Nasarawa State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Peter Msuega Azende, Arden University, United Kingdom.

(2) Saviour Ekpo, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

(3) Ifrat Jahan, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Idrees, Post-Graduate Medical Institute Lahore, Ameer-Ud-Din Medical College Lahore, Lahore General Hospital Lahore, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Peter Msuega Azende, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saviour Ekpo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ifrat Jahan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Niger State Primary Health Care Development Agency’s Communication Strategies in Mitigating Polio Vaccine Hesitancy in Minna, Niger State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Dr Pina Filippello, University of Messina, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Oromidayo Ogunlade, Texila America University, Guyana.

(2) Zaheer Khan, AIOU, Pakistan.

(3) Meraim Attyah Kazaal, Al–Qadisiyah, Al-Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(4) Anna Liza A. Saus, Ateneo de Davao University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Essoh Ayimba, Université de Lomé, Togo.

(2) Rashidat Oluwabukola Owolabi, Emirates College of Health Sciences and Technology, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oromidayo Ogunlade, Guyana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zaheer Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Meraim Attyah Kazaal, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Anna Liza A. Saus, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Low-Cost Planting Precision for Smallholders: A Review of Low-tech Row-spacing Tools, Agronomic Outcomes and Input-efficiency

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sagar Madhukar Chavan, D. Y. Patil Agriculture and Technical University, India.

(2) Anurag Patel, Sanjeev Agrawal Global Educational (SAGE), University, India.

(3) D. T. Bornare, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sagar Madhukar Chavan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anurag Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (D. T. Bornare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA