Author Archive: admin

Peer Review History: Evaluation the Effect of Solanum melongena on Some Coagulation Parameters among Sudanese People in Khartoum State, Sudan

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Moaed Al Meselmani, International project Manager, Grantham Centre, The University of Sheffield, UK.

(2) Prof. Levent SON, School of Silifke, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Adarsh Pandey, Swami Shukdevanand College, India.

(2) Angus Onwudiwe Ikeh, University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Nigeria.

(3) Jayashree Dey Sarkar, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adarsh Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angus Onwudiwe Ikeh, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jayashree Dey Sarkar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of Substitution of Fish Meal by Cricket Meal (Acheta domesticus) on the Growth of Fry of Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mostafa Ahmed Mohamed Soliman, Animal Production Research Institute (APRI), Agriculrture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Erhan Unlu, Dicle University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mostafa Ahmed Mohamed Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Erhan Unlu, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Case Study on Sustainable Waste Management of FMCG Market Returns

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Akram Azaz, Tezpur University, India.

(2) Sruthiya V N, St.Josesph’s College (Autonomous), India.

(3) Shubhi Agarwal, Delhi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akram Azaz, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sruthiya V N, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shubhi Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Analysis of the Efficiency of Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in Reducing Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography: A Clinical Feasibility Study

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pratima Parashar Pandey, School of Science & Engineering, IILM University, India.

(2) Prof. Abbas Mohammed, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden.

Reviewers:

(1) K. M. Masud Rana, The Aga Khan Hospital, Tanzania.

(2) Kostandina Veljanovska, University St Kliment Ohridski, N Macedonia.

(3) Vijayalakshmi Kakulapati, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. M. Masud Rana, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kostandina Veljanovska, N Macedonia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vijayalakshmi Kakulapati, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF HOSPITALIZATIONS FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF BELÉM DO PARÁ BETWEEN 2019 AND 2023

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Katayoun Haryalchi, Associate Professor, Guilan University of Medical Science, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Panchumarthy Ravisankar, Vignan Pharmacy College, India.

(2) R. Indumathi, Manakula Vinayagar Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Panchumarthy Ravisankar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Indumathi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Performing Effective Calculations of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy with the Help of Molecular Dynamics Methods

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tushar Ranjan, Assistant Professor & Scientist, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur-813210 (Bihar), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mayank Yadav, AVIPS, Shobhit University, India.

(2) Umer Sherefedin Yasin, Adama Science and Technology University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mayank Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Umer Sherefedin Yasin, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: To study the constraints faced and suggestions made by the cattle rearers in management of milch cattle during transition period.

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and Hod, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Moges Eriso Blate, School of Veterinary Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Hamed Faghiri, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Moges Eriso Blate, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hamed Faghiri, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Preclinical Immunogenicity of Capsule and Outermembrane Proteins of a Local Neurotropic Isolate of Hemophilus Infleunzae B in a Lapin Model

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), Concordia, Canada.

(2) Dr. Cynthia Aracely Alvizo Báez, Professor, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ezediuno Louis Odinakaose, Nigeria.

(2) Abduladeem G.M. Al-Selwi, University Mohammed V, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ezediuno Louis Odinakaose, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abduladeem G.M. Al-Selwi, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Food Safety and Hygiene Practices of Kitchen Staff of Boarding Senior High Schools in Amenfi West Municipality, Ghana

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Omaka Onyekachi, Nigeria.

(2) Shovit Dutta, BGC Trust Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omaka Onyekachi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shovit Dutta, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Enhancement of Trap Catches of Melon Fruit Fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) by Gel Formulations of Protein Bait

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Surender K. Sharma, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India.

(2) Kishor Pujar, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Surender K. Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kishor Pujar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA