Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmy Syafitri, Dharmawangsa University, North Sumatera.

(2) Paul B. Doronila, Central Philippines State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmy Syafitri, North Sumatera) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paul B. Doronila, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Muscettola, Credit Risk Manager, Banco BPM, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Carmen Alexandrache, Dunarea De Jos University of Galati, Romania.

(2) Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad, Erbil Polytechnic University – Erbil College of Technical Management, IRAQ.

(3) S. Kanimozhi, Gnanam School of Business, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel G. Hope, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, China.

(2) Joseph Aldo Irawan, Sahid University, Indonesia.

(3) Mirza Muhammad Ali Baig, University of Education, Pakistan.

(4) Priya Bennett, ITM Skills University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Carmen Alexandrache, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad, IRAQ) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Kanimozhi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nguyen Van Hop, Vietnam National University of Forestry – Dong Nai Campus, Vietnam.

(2) Ashokkumar Motiram, India.

(3) Yogesh Sadashiv Patil, Shivaji University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Frieyo Omowumi Omotoyosi, Washington State University, USA.

(2) Ishaku James Dantata, Federal University, Gashua, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nguyen Van Hop, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashokkumar Motiram, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yogesh Sadashiv Patil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sania Arif, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Rajashree Khatua, Odisha of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sania Arif, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajashree Khatua, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Huan-Liang Tsai, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Abdul Kareem Ahmad Aqeel, Jordan.

(2) Benlaria Ismail, University of Ahmed Draia – Adrar-ALGERIA, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ismail Masalha, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmad Abdul Kareem Ahmad Aqeel, Jordan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Benlaria Ismail, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Qing Li, Anhui Agricultural University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kadiri Oluwaseun, Nigeria.

(2) Bhupendra Singh Parmar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashok Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kadiri Oluwaseun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhupendra Singh Parmar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Avtar Singh Bimbraw, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Salisu Audu Baba, College of Education, Zing, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Kumar Dwivedi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avtar Singh Bimbraw, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salisu Audu Baba, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Taha Shabbir, Hamdard Uni, Pakistan.

(2) R.V. Suganya, Vels Institute of Science Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Taha Shabbir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R.V. Suganya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Rachana Pathak, University of Lucknow, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Enes ATA, Bingol University, Turkey.

(2) Ahmed Ali Al-Sayed, University of Bonn, Germany.

(3) Mohammadesmail Nikfar, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed E. Abouelregal, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(2) Anisur Rahman Pramanik, Bangladesh.

(3) Cristian Octav Olteanu, Polytechnic University of Bucharest, Romania.

(4) Stefano Serra Capizzano, Uppsala University, Sweden.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Enes ATA, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Ali Al-Sayed, Germany) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammadesmail Nikfar, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Urja Pandya, India.

(2) Praveen Kumar Dasari, Mother Teresa Pharmacy College, India.

(3) Jayalaxmi Ganguli, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dwarka, JNKVV, College of Agriculture, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Urja Pandya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Praveen Kumar Dasari,India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jayalaxmi Ganguli, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA