Peer Review History: A Biomedical Engineering–Inspired Smart Housing System for Autonomous Human Thermoregulation Using Bio-Humid Wall Bricks: A Comprehensive review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Moazzam, Green International University, Pakistan.

(2) Manu Mitra, University of Bridgeport, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Moazzam, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manu Mitra, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION AND ANTIBIOGRAM OF BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM ROASTED PORK MEAT SOLD BY VENDORS IN ABAKPA ENUGU

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Idress Hamad Attitalla, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Libya.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Rizwan, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Auwalu Sammani, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria.

(3) S. Vijayalakshmi, Sri Sarada College for Women (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kunal Batabyal, WBUAFS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Rizwan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Auwalu Sammani, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Vijayalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Empirical modeling of Malaria cases in Erstwhile Mpohor District, Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Kamal Dyab, Assiut University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Enes ATA, Bingol University, Turkey.

(2) Bapan Kalita, The Assam Royal Global University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kelvin Muzundu, University of Zambia, Zambia.

(2) Raghavendran Prabakaran, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Enes ATA, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bapan Kalita, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: ICT AND AI PLATFORMS FOR FARMERS: A REVIEW

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University,Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohan Naik R, Visvesvaraya Technological University, India.

(2) Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, Parul Institute of Techonology, Parul University, India.

(3) ShivaPrakash. S, New Horizon College of Engineering, India.

(4) Yakubu Magaji Yuguda, Agriculture Engineering Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(5) Ferdowsi Easmin, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Hemalatha, Sree Rama Engineering College, India.

(2) Uqbah Iqbal, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) akubu Magaji Yuguda, Federal Polytechnic, Kaltungo, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohan Naik R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (ShivaPrakash. S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Yakubu Magaji Yuguda, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Ferdowsi Easmin, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic diversity studies using Principal Component Analysis in Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mihai- IacobBențea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca (USAMVCN), Romania.

(2) R. Muthuvijayaragavan, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rohlupuii, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Shumate Kebede Hirpa, Dire Dawa University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mihai- Iacob Bențe, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Muthuvijayaragavan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Analysis of Agricultural Sustainability in Western Maharashtra, India: A District Wise Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Aashish Gyawali, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Veena Suresh, NITC, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Hemalatha, Sree Rama Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aashish Gyawali, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Veena Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Entrepreneurial Behaviour of Tribal Women Involved in Sericulture: A Study in Dhemaji District, Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Veerya Nayak, Kamala Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(2) Emmanuel Osei Asiamah, Knutsford University, Ghana.

(3) Satish Manikrao Dhoke, Moreshwar Arts, Science and Commerce College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asiagwu Harriet, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria.

(2) Abdul Hadi Wasil, Afghanistan National Agricultural Sciences and Technology University-ANASTU, Afghanistan.

(3) Fitriani kahar, Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang, Indonesia.

(4) P. Raja, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Veerya Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Emmanuel Osei Asiamah, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Satish Manikrao Dhoke, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Raw Soybean Meal Quality and Detection of Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles (DDGS) Adulteration

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sakariyau Adio Waheed, Old Dominion University, USA.

(2) Hozan Jalil Hamasalim, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.

(3) Hameedah Adebimpe, The University of Tulsa, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Susmita Sahoo, Nirma University, Michigan State University(online), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.53/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sakariyau Adio Waheed, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hozan Jalil Hamasalim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hameedah Adebimpe, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Mini-Implants in Paediatric Oral Rehabilitation: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, MuglaSitkiKocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Adil Asim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

(2) MK Singhal, India.

(3) Hosam E. Said, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Adil Asim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (MK Singhal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hosam E. Said, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Mathematical Model on the Dynamics of Teacher Adoption of Problem-Based Learning in Mathematics Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Teresa T. Garcia, Ilocos Sur Polytechnic State College, Philippines.

(2) Faraidun Kadir Hamasalh, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) R Srikanth, School of Humanities Science, SASTRA, India.

(2) Rivo Panji Yudha, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Teresa T. Garcia, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Faraidun Kadir Hamasalh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA