Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Asha Bhausaheb Kadam, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) T.M.Hemalatha, ANGRAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) N. Sabitha Devi, Telangana Social Welfare Residential Degree College for Women, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asha Bhausaheb Kadam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T.M.Hemalatha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Divya U K, Mahatma Gandhi University, India.

(2) Edwin Fernando Vasquez Vasquez, Biology Institute for Basic and Applied Research, Peru.

(3) Alang Michael Bong, The University of Ngaounder, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divya U K, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Edwin Fernando Vasquez Vasquez, Peru) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alang Michael Bong, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research , India.

Reviewers:

(1) Abe Ayotunde Sunday, National Research Institute for Chemical Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Shara Salih Ali, Bakrajo Technical Institute, Polytechnic University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abe Ayotunde Sunday, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shara Salih Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Swaran Lata, ICFRE-Himalayan Forest Research Institute, India.

(2) M.C. Santiago Ruiz Ramírez, National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chhote Lal Chowdhary, Biodiversity Conservation Center Nepal, Nepal.

(2) Sundar S. Mety, Shri. Gavisiddeshwara Arts, Science and commerce College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swaran Lata, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M.C. Santiago Ruiz Ramírez, México) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Fayhaa Abbood Mahdi Al-Nadawi, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(2) Ir Yunus Arifien, Nusa Bangsa University, Indonesia.

(3) Tharringwon Marchang Ningshen, Nagaland University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Teme G. Fita, Wollega University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fayhaa Abbood Mahdi Al- Nadawi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yunus Arifien, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tharringwon Marchang Ningshen, Nagaland) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kosev Valentin, Institute of Forage Crops, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Dheerendra Kumar, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Muhidin Biya Hajigelan, Ethiopian Institute Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atsede Teklu, Tigray Agricultural Research Institute, Axum Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

(2) Kassa Sisay Aragaw, Sirinka Agricultural Research Center, Amhara Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI), Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dheerendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhidin Biya Hajigelan, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hao-Yang Wang, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghufran Al-Obaidy, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Manisha Kotadiya, K.B. Raval College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Worku Tegegne Molla, De Montfort University, UK.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghufran Al-Obaidy, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manisha Kotadiya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Worku Tegegne Molla, UK) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Robert Meves, São Paulo University, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Adam Alexander, The Royal College of Ophthalmologists, United Kingdom.

(2) Isha Chaturvedi, TSM University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adam Alexander, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Isha Chaturvedi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) IDOWU Adijat Oyeyemi, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Awad Elbashir, Qatar.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hamzah Abdul Hamid, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (IDOWU Adijat Oyeyemi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Awad Elbashir, Qatar) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Noor Ul Ain, Adelaide University, Australia.

(2) Mythily Rao Ponaganti, KIMS (Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mayur V. Savsan, H. & H. B. Kotak Institute of Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noor Ul Ain, Australia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mythily Rao Ponaganti, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA