Peer Review History: Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR–Cas Systems: Mechanisms, Genome Editing Applications, Therapeutic Potential, and Ethical Considerations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Susmitha, St. Pious X Degree and PG College for Women (Autonomous), India.

(2) Aditi Raj , Narayan Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Susmitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aditi Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agronomic Approaches for Sustainable Production of Fruits and Vegetables

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. P. Chindaprasirt, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Theodor Friedrich, Germany.

(2) Rasha el-said Abdel-Hak, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Theodor Friedrich, Germany) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rasha el-said Abdel-Hak, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: STUDY OF π- INCLINE STRUCTURE ON INCLINE ALGEBRA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Presley Kiplagat, Kirinyaga University, Kenya.

(2) Harjeet Singh, Wisdom World School, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Presley Kiplagat, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harjeet Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of a Solar-Powered Automated Lighting and Agrivoltaic Trellis System for Enhanced Photosynthesis in Dragon Fruit Cultivation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Omprakash Sahu, Sambalpur University, India.

(2) Aloke Verma, Kalinga University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omprakash Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aloke Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mango Seed Kernel Starch: Assessing the Compatibility and Biodegradability of a Promising Renewable Feedstock for Packaging Materials

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Temesggen Feleke Fera, Wolkite University, Ethiopia.

(2) Zeffouni Zakia, University Of Blida1, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Temesggen Feleke Fera, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zeffouni Zakia, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: DCC Banks of Chhattisgarh position and share percentage in India with different parameters

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean Béguinot, University of Burgundy, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Gopala Bhua, Sambalpur University, India.

(2) Ailinca Alina Georgeta, “Victor Slăvescu” Centre for Financial and Monetary Research, Romania.

(3) Munib Ur Rehman, Pakistan.

(4) Krisztina Melinda Dobay, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gopala Bhua, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ailinca Alina Georgeta, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Munib Ur Rehman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Krisztina Melinda Dobay, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: EXPLICIT FORMULAS AND PERIODIC BEHAVIOR OF SOLUTIONS FOR A CLASS OF RATIONAL RECURSIVE SEQUENCES

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Rev Andy Nyako Moses, Lincoln University College, Malaysia.

(2) Bandita Phukan, Women’s College, India.

(3) Ngaka John Nchejane, National University of Lesotho, Lesotho.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rev Andy Nyako Moses, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bandita Phukan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ngaka John Nchejane, Lesotho) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: ANALYSIS OF HYPERTENSION IN ELDERLY PEOPLE IN PARÁ BETWEEN THE YEARS 2020 AND 2024: an epidemiological study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rituja Kaushal,LN Medical College and Research Center, India.

(2) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anderso Brandao Dos Santos, Universidade Estadual do Parana, Brasil.

(2) Micheal Abimbola Oladosu, Anchor University, Nigeria.

(3) Fai Chan, Deli Aroma LLC, USA.

(4) Khanchi Mead. , Kazakhstan.

(5) Hediye Dagdeviren, Istanbul Aydin University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anderso Brandao Dos Santos, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Micheal Abimbola Oladosu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fai Chan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Khanchi Mead, Kazakhstan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Hediye Dagdeviren, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: A comparative study of compost and it’s raw material olive mill solid waste

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Phindile Madikizela, Institute for Water Research, Rhodes University, South Africa.

(2) Darshana T. Bhatti, VVP Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Phindile Madikizela, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Darshana T. Bhatti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) to Different Levels of Nano Fertilizers and Conventional Fertilizers on Growth and Yield

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Monier Morad Wahba, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ebrahim Alinia-Ahandani, Iran.

(2) Pradip Kumar, C.C.S. University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ebrahim Alinia-Ahandani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradip Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | J.Ch. to JABB from JEAI | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA