Peer Review History: Evaluation of Selected Haematological Biomarkers among Sickle Cell Patients Attending University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano,University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

(2) Dr. Safinaz Ebrahim El-Toukhy, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Chia Louis Deng, Cameroon.

(2) Nitu Nigam, India.

(3) Divya Amaravadi, Anurag University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ameer Jabbar Shwayel, Southern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Nitu Nigam, King George’s Medical University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chia Louis Deng, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nitu Nigam, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Divya Amaravadi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Nano Urea on Quality, Plant and Soil Nutrients Status of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum Br.) under Precision Nitrogen Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Himangshu Das, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Behnaz Atashpaz, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources,Iran.

(3) Myrtel S. Bernardo, Bulacan Agricultural State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandra Shekhar, India.

(2) Elahe Kanani, Imam Khomeini International University, Iran.

(3) SORY Aboubacar, Joseph KI-ZERBO University, Burkina Faso.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Himangshu Das, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Behnaz Atashpaz, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Myrtel S. Bernardo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Water Use Efficiency and Irrigation Innovations in Crop Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dibyendu Pal, Seacom Skills University, India.

(2) Aabil Husain, Prestige Institute of Management & Research, Gwalior, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dibyendu Pal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aabil Husain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterisation and Energy Valorisation Trials of Septic Tank Sludge from Urban Areas in Benin, West Africa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Temesggen Feleke Fera, Wolkite University, Ethiopia.

(2) Heronima D. Sanchez, Benguet State University-Bokod Campus, Philippines.

(3) S.Meenachi, K.S.Rangasamy College of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

A. Gnanamani, CSIR-CLRI, India.

Emmanuel  Onyenweife Ayadinuno, Nnamdi  Azikiwe  University, Nigeria.

Kavita Gour, Priyadarshini J L College of Engineering, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Temesggen Feleke Fera, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Heronima D. Sanchez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.Meenachi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioconversion of banana pseudostem into value added bio manure

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Muzamil Yousuf, Sher e Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (J&K), India.

(2) Abdul Kadir Salam, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(3) Kukuh Setiawan, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muzamil Yousuf, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdul Kadir Salam, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kukuh Setiawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soil Physicochemical Properties and Nutritional Quality of Worowo (Senecio biafrae) in Soils Treated with Neem-Enriched Cow Dung/Sawdust Compost

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Reda E. Essa, Egypt.

(2) Ashish Kar, The Energy and Resources Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kerrouche Ibrahim, University of Constantine 1, Algeria.

(2) Tammam Kheder Yaghi, Bucharest University, Netherlands.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Reda E. Essa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish Kar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Phytosanitary Risks in Cocoa Rubber and Rice Production via the Quebec Pesticide Risk Indicator in central west Ivory Coast

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Md. Hossain Ali, Bangladesh Agricultural University Campus, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Senthilkumar, Tamilnadu Agricultural University (TNAU), India.

(2) Anatolii Semenov, Poltava State Agrarian University, Ukraine.

(3) Moale Cristina, Romania.

(4) Wanida Petlamul, Songkhla Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rajkishore Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Senthilkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anatolii Semenov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Moale Cristina, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Wanida Petlamul, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnobotanical and Pharmacological Assessment of Thirty Medicinal Plant Species Used in Tropical Region of Nigeria for Microbial Disease Management: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Neena Singla, Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Punam Jyoti Borah, Sibsagar University, India.

(2) Ashmita Banik, India.

(3) Jagdish Choudhary, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Punam Jyoti Borah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashmita Banik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jagdish Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Host-plant morphological and biochemical determinants affecting chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) susceptibility to the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Ganga Gharty Chhetri, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Djamel Eddine Laib, University of 20 August 1955, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Kumar Rajak, Sardar Patel University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ganga Gharty Chhetri, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Djamel Eddine Laib, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Policy to Pastoralists: Rethinking Iron–Folate Supplementation Strategies in Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkha Devi, Sikkim Maniapl college of Nursing, India.

(2) Dr. Malar Kodi S, All India Institutes Of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivani Singh, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Adamu Dalhatu, Bayero University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Azza Abdalsemia Elewa, Helwan university , Egypt.

(2) Firoza Bano, Al-Falah School of Medical Sciences and Research Centre Faridabad, India.

(3) Vinu Choudhary, Bisu Hospital & Fertility Centre, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivani Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adamu Dalhatu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA