Peer Review History: Tunnel Technique with Connective Tissue Graft for Root Coverage of Teeth with Restored Cervical Lesions: Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine And University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Tew In Meei, The National University of Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Rafael Santiago de Almeida, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri – UFVJM, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sunny Mavi, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences & Research, India.

(2) Anahita Punj, Army College of Dental Sciences, Secunderabad, Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, India.

(3) Ildikó Tar, University of Debrecen, Hungary.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tew In Meei, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rafael Santiago de Almeida, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization in Protein structure and function prediction of silk of Tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta Drury

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) K.V.Arunkumar, India.

(2) Sharda Gupta, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K.V.Arunkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sharda Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Maize Substitution with Fermented Sugarcane Tops on Growth Performance and Lipid Profile of Broiler Chickens

Editor(s):

(1) Prof .  Angélica Machi Lazarin, State University of Maringá,  Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Gabriella Chimuanya Iheanacho, Clemson University, USA.

(2) AGWU ANI EKWE,FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC NGODO-ISUOCHI, NIGERIA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ankit Sharma, School of Veterinary Sciences, Abhilashi University, India.

(2) Ekuma Emmanuel T, Nigeria.

(3) Julia Marixara Sousa Da Silva, Goiano Federal Institute of Education Science and Technology (Instituto Federal Goiano—IF Goiano), Brazil.

(4) Olorunlowu, S. A, Poznan University of Life Sceinces, Poland.

(5) Shameeran Salman Ismael, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gabriella Chimuanya Iheanacho, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (AGWU ANI EKWE, NIGERIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Selection Criteria and Genetic Variability Studies in Salinity Tolerant Rice Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers: 

(1) Basant Kumar Dadarwal, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

(2) Forkwa Etienne Yong, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fahmi Fuadah, Immanuel Inastitute of Health, Indonesia.

(2) Hem Prakash Verma, ICAR-National Institute of Biotic Stress Management, India.

(3) Ibrahim Mehdi, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Basant Kumar Dadarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Forkwa Etienne Yong, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development Trends and Strategic Transformation of Taiwan’s Coffee Industry: An Industry Life Cycle Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Smrita Jain, Moradabad Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Afsar Ali, Mewar University, India.

(3) Julius Cesar O. Mamaril, Pangasinan State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ernest Vlacic, Metropolitan University, Serbia.

(2) Julius Cesar O. Mamaril, Pangasinan State University, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.44/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Smrita Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Afsar Ali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Julius Cesar O. Mamaril, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Relationship Between Growth Mindset and Mathematics Achievement

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Mauritius.

Reviewers:

(1) Antonio Luque De La Rosa, Universidad De Almería, Spain.

(2) Musab Ghaderi, Khalkhal university of medical science, Iran.

(3) Santosh Yadav, University of Mysore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Christianah Olajumoke Sam-Kayode, Lead City University, Nigeria.

(2) Havva Kurt Taspinar, Izmir Institute of Technology, Turkiye.

(3) Jadab Dutta, Arunachal University of Studies (AUS), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Antonio Luque De La Rosa, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Musab Ghaderi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Santosh Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pronunciation Problem with Bengali Speaking Learners and Trends in Modern English Phonology: A Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E.Seda Koç, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Anjali Verma, Smt. Mithibai Motiram Kundnani College of Commerce and Economics, India.

(2) Huanan Su, Kunming Medical University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) I Putu Andre Suhardiana, Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa, Indonesia.

(2) Jeyaraj John Sekar, The American College, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anjali Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Huanan Su, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Correlational Analysis of Multi-Cultural Education and Religious Tolerance among Undergraduate Social Studies Students in Delta and Edo States

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sylvia Stavridi, Library of Alexandria, Egypt.

(2) Irena Nikaj, University Fan Noli Korça, Albania.

(3) Omotayo Foluke Siwoku-Awi, The University Of Ilorin, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sylvia Stavridi, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Irena Nikaj, Albania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Omotayo Foluke Siwoku-Awi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formulation and Evaluation of Nutri Bar Incorporating Millet

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Josephine Cudjoe, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(2) Priyakshi Borkotoky, Piramal Swasthya Management and Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kamla Mahajani, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Josephine Cudjoe, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priyakshi Borkotoky, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Women Entrepreneurship in India: A Pathway to Inclusive Growth

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Rajendra Prasad Devathoti, St. Ann’s College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Dr. Kleopatra Nikolopoulou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogita K S, Jain deemed to be University, India.

(2) Snigdha Choudhury, Tezpur Central University, India.

(3) Buddhini Dankanda, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G.Prasanna Kumar, Pragati Engineering College, India.

(2) Jackson Bulili, Institute of Rural Development Planning, Tanzania.

(3) Mohammed Kerbouche, University of Mascara, Algeria.

(4) Sunita Rani, Sarojini Naidu Centre for Women’s Studies, India.

(5) M. Abdul Rahuman, Sadakathullah Appa College ( Autonomous ), India.

(6) Atsushi Kobayashi, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Japan.

(7) Partha S Sarkar, Tripura University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogita K S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Snigdha Choudhury, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Buddhini Dankanda, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | J.ch from ACRI to JSRR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA