Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Iqbal Hussain, Pakistan.

(2) Aderibigbe Helen Adeniyi, National Horticultural Research Institute, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Iqbal Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aderibigbe Helen Adeniyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

(2) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Subbarayudu Thunga, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, India.

(2) Eni Siti Rohaeni, Animal Husbandry Research Center, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subbarayudu Thunga, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eni Siti Rohaeni, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Eni Siti Rohaeni, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Prem Chand Gyani, ICFRE-Rain Forest Research Institute, India.

(2) Muhammad Zulkiffal, Wheat Research Institute, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prem Chand Gyani, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Zulkiffal, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, India.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Waseem Ahmed Khattak, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Pakistan.

(2) Prachi Ugle, University College of London, England.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waseem Ahmed Khattak, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prachi Ugle, England) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Harsh S. Hathi, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mukesh Nitharwal, S K N Agriculture University, India.

(3) Dr. Irfan Khan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harsh S. Hathi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mukesh Nitharwal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dr. Irfan Khan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Huda Jasim M. Altameme, University of Babylon, College of Science for Women, Iraq.

(2) Serge Rozov, Institute of Cytology and Genetics SD RAS, Russia.

(3) Edenilson Brandl, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Huda Jasim M. Altameme, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Serge Rozov, Russia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Edenilson Brandl, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Nidhin M M, Shri Dhanwantry Ayurvedic College & Hospital, India.

(2) Divya Sathish, CL Baid Metha College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Harjinder Kaur, RKSD College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nidhin M M, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Divya Sathish, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Harjinder Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhruvendra Singh Sachan, C.S.A. University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Divya Bahuguna, Graphic Era Hill University, India.

(3) Siddhant Gupta, GBPUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhruvendra Singh Sachan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Divya Bahuguna, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Siddhant Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON levent, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sonia Panigrahi, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Mehdi Taheri Asghari, University of Paiam-e-Noor, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sonia Panigrahi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehdi Taheri Asghari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Kumaresan, Vels Institutes of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

(2) Erecson Sipin Solis, Camiguin Polytechnic State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Kumaresan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Erecson Sipin Solis, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA