Peer Review History: Optimizing Sowing Time and Spacing for Enhanced Seed Yield and Component Traits in BJRI Deshi Pat Shak 1 (Corchorus capsularis L.) (BJC-390)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Moaed Al Meselmani, The University of Sheffield, UK.

(2) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Anil Shahane, Central Agricultural University,India .

(2) Tejaskumar Hardasbhai Borkhatariya, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit Anil Shahane, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tejaskumar Hardasbhai Borkhatariya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Timolol-Induced Atrioventricular Block in a Glaucoma Patient: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abha Chandra, Sciences Integral University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yaw Adu-Boakye, Ghana.

(2) Sushma Kumari Saini , India.

(3) Roheeda Amanullah , Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Birupaksha Biswas, The West Bengal University Of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Filip Konecny, McMaster University, Canada.

(3) J Gerard Rakesh, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital Research Centre, India.

(4) Khan Bahadar Khan, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

(5) Mohammad Saleh Sadeghi, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yaw Adu-Boakye, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sushma Kumari Saini , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Roheeda Amanullah , Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of the Microbes Mediated Organic Production Module on the Yield and Quality of the Khasi Mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) in the Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean-Paul Ngbolua Koto-Te-Nyiwa, University of Kinshasa, Congo DR.

Reviewers:

(1) Vishalakshi G Hanamanal, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ajay R. Tapre, The Charutar Vidya Mandal (CVM) University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jean Kumbirayi Nzuma , Scientific & Industrial Research & Development Centre (SIRDC), Zimbabwe.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vishalakshi G Hanamanal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajay R. Tapre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Vermicompost in Organic Agriculture: Processes, Properties, and Agronomic Benefits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Muzamil Yousuf, SKUAST Jammu, India.

(2) Yurii Dehtiarov, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Sinha, Bundelkhand University Jhansi, India.

(2) Sivanantha j, Annamalai university, India.         .

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muzamil Yousuf, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yurii Dehtiarov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determination of Genetic Diversity of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp.)] Genotypes Using SSR Marker

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Preeti Jain, Medicaps University, India.

(2) Irfan Talib, Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, GC University, Pakistan.

(3) Akhilesh Kumar, Swami Rama Himalayan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Preeti Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Irfan Talib, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Akhilesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nitrogen and Sulphur Fertilisation on Growth, Yield, and Economics of Late-Sown Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under Central India Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Alexandru Mîrza , Republic of Moldova.

(2) Deekshith HN, India.

(3) Shohreh Kazemi, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Elsayed Ahmed Maaty, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alexandru Mîrza , Republic of Moldova) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deekshith HN, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shohreh Kazemi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dynamics in fungi community structure and diversity: a negative impact of bat guano fertilizer on agricultural farmlands

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Amira Mohammed-Roshdy Ibrahim Ibrahim Asar, Biotechnology Research Insitute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shrey Bodhankar, School of Agricultural Sciences, Anurag University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amira Mohammed-Roshdy Ibrahim Ibrahim Asar, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ear Related Traits in Wheat Genotypes under Terminal Heat Stress

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suman Ghimire, Nepal Polytechnic Institute, Nepal.

(2) Shailesh Kumar, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

(3) Shambhoo Prasad, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suman Ghimire, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shailesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shambhoo Prasad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climate Change and Sustainable Agriculture: Pathways to Resilience, Productivity and Decarbonisation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Remmiya Rajan P, University of Calicut, India.

(2) Mahesh Kumar Gaur, ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, India.

(3) K.Katturajan, Tamil Nadu Open University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amrit Dhakal, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

(2) Anani Ogou, University of Dschang, Central Africa.

(3) Antônio Pereira Júnior, Pará State University, Brazil.

(4) Kabiru Hamisu, SR University, India.

(5) Ochuko Felix Orikpete, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Remmiya Rajan P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahesh Kumar Gaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K.Katturajan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Breeding Populations for Yield and Late leaf Spot Resistance under Togo Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Saket Kumar, KPS P.G. College Bundelkhand University, India.

(2) Urmila Rana, D.P.B.H.P.G. College, India.

(3) Thatikonda Vinod Kumar, Sri Konda Laxman Telangana Horticultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ria Manurung, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Yos Sudarso, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saket Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Urmila Rana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Thatikonda Vinod Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA