Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Hülya Serpil Kavuşan, EGE University, Turkiye.

(2) Sushma Ishwar Havanur, DSLD College of Horticultural Engineering & Food Technology, India.

(3) Hassimi Moussa, Boubakar BA University of Tillaberi, Niger.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdelrahman Said Talab, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, (NIOF), Egypt.

(2) Esin Ünsaldi, Necmettin Erbakan University, Türkiye.

(3) Mohmmd Abdu, CCRUM, India.

(4) Rolando Pakingking, Central Philippine University, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hülya Serpil Kavuşan, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sushma Ishwar Havanur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hassimi Moussa, Niger) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ferit Gürbüz, Kırklareli University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Shah Fahed, University of Jhang, Pakistan.

(2) Danna Lesley Cruz Reyes, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia.

(3) Tejaskumar Chimanbhai Sharma, The Charutar Vidya Mandal (CVM) University, India.

(4) Eddula Keshava Reddy, JNTUA, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Danna Lesley Cruz Reyes, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia.

(2) E Keshava Reddy, JNTUA College of Engineering Anantapur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shah Fahed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Danna Lesley Cruz Reyes, Colombia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tejaskumar Chimanbhai Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Eddula Keshava Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Asha Bhausaheb Kadam, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) T.M.Hemalatha, ANGRAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) N. Sabitha Devi, Telangana Social Welfare Residential Degree College for Women, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asha Bhausaheb Kadam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T.M.Hemalatha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Divya U K, Mahatma Gandhi University, India.

(2) Edwin Fernando Vasquez Vasquez, Biology Institute for Basic and Applied Research, Peru.

(3) Alang Michael Bong, The University of Ngaounder, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divya U K, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Edwin Fernando Vasquez Vasquez, Peru) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alang Michael Bong, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research , India.

Reviewers:

(1) Abe Ayotunde Sunday, National Research Institute for Chemical Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Shara Salih Ali, Bakrajo Technical Institute, Polytechnic University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abe Ayotunde Sunday, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shara Salih Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Swaran Lata, ICFRE-Himalayan Forest Research Institute, India.

(2) M.C. Santiago Ruiz Ramírez, National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chhote Lal Chowdhary, Biodiversity Conservation Center Nepal, Nepal.

(2) Sundar S. Mety, Shri. Gavisiddeshwara Arts, Science and commerce College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swaran Lata, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M.C. Santiago Ruiz Ramírez, México) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Fayhaa Abbood Mahdi Al-Nadawi, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(2) Ir Yunus Arifien, Nusa Bangsa University, Indonesia.

(3) Tharringwon Marchang Ningshen, Nagaland University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Teme G. Fita, Wollega University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fayhaa Abbood Mahdi Al- Nadawi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yunus Arifien, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tharringwon Marchang Ningshen, Nagaland) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kosev Valentin, Institute of Forage Crops, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Dheerendra Kumar, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Muhidin Biya Hajigelan, Ethiopian Institute Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atsede Teklu, Tigray Agricultural Research Institute, Axum Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

(2) Kassa Sisay Aragaw, Sirinka Agricultural Research Center, Amhara Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI), Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dheerendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhidin Biya Hajigelan, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hao-Yang Wang, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghufran Al-Obaidy, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Manisha Kotadiya, K.B. Raval College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Worku Tegegne Molla, De Montfort University, UK.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghufran Al-Obaidy, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manisha Kotadiya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Worku Tegegne Molla, UK) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Robert Meves, São Paulo University, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Adam Alexander, The Royal College of Ophthalmologists, United Kingdom.

(2) Isha Chaturvedi, TSM University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adam Alexander, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Isha Chaturvedi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA