Peer Review History: Predictors of Clinical Outcomes among Kidney Disease Patients Presenting with Hemorrhagic Stroke

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kinnari B Vala, Gujarat University of transplantation Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Farshad Banouei, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Khin Phyu Pyar, Defense Services Medical Academy, Myanmar.

(3) Ravichandran Palani, Sri Venkateswaraa University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Franklin Bordojowski, UK.

(2) Gholamreza Mesbah, University of Ardakan, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Farshad Banouei, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khin Phyu Pyar, Myanmar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ravichandran Palani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Viability and Determinants of Ginger Natural Farming in the North Eastern Hill Region of India: A Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Soeb Md. Shoayeb Noman, Uttara University , Bangladesh.

(2) S.L. Borana, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ismail Ukav, Adiyaman  University, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage:  8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soeb Md. Shoayeb Noman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.L. Borana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Current Status of Grain Quality Assessment in APMCs for Major Cities of Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Manimalathi, Sri Ramakrishna College of Arts & Science, India.

(2) Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Al Madinah International University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adelle A C Blair, Antigua and Barbuda.

(2) Funa Moyo, Zimbabwe.

(3) Jayantkumar Vijay Rane, The Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, India.

(4) Mama Julius, Uganda.

(5) Shivcharan Meena, India.

(6) Sreelakshmi P, School of Business and Management , Christ University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Manimalathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economics of Growth Production of Indigenous Chicken Fed Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) with or without Supplementation of Exogenous Enzyme

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Kuban State Techno-logical University,  Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Dharmendra Kumar, Bihar Veterinary College, Patna, Bihar, India.

(2) Mahesh Ravindra Jawale, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, India.

(3) Shital V. Chopde, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jyotsana, LUVAS, India.

(2) Olamide Durodola, Auburn University, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dharmendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahesh Ravindra Jawale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shital V. Chopde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nano Urea on Growth, Productivity and Economic Return in Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Juan Izquierdoi, Uruguay.

(2) Sabah Gazi Shareef, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juan Izquierdoi, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sabah Gazi Shareef, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Modified Atmospheric Packaging on Storability of Groundnut Kernels (Arachis Hypogaea L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Puguh Bintang Pamungkas, Indonesia.

(2) Hanan Abdullah Ali, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anisii Anisievich Alekseev, Russian.

(2) Dasari Sravani, Aditya University, India.

(3) Elizabeth Thangamani Sunitha, St. Xavier’s College, India.

(4) T Velumani, Rathinam Colege Of Arts And Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Puguh Bintang Pamungkas, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanan Abdullah Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Simulation Based Training in to Clinical Competence among Nursing Students: Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S, All India Institutes Of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharti Sharma, College of Nursing, AIIMS, India.

(2) Noorjan K S, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Manimehalai, V.V.Vanniaperumal Nursing College for Women, India.

(2) Naziha Inam, Riphah International University, Pakistan.

(3) Rajalaxmi Mishra, Odisha University of health sciences, College of Nursing Berhampur, India.

(4) Sobur Setiaman, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bharti Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noorjan K S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physiological and Biochemical Changes during Accelerated Aged Seeds of Combine Harvested Rice Varieties

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhukya Srinivas, India.

(2) Shubham Thapa, HNB Garhwal University (A Central University), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhukya Srinivas, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubham Thapa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Training Need of the Extension Agents for Value Chain Development

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Asfaw Temesgen Bari, Ethiopia.

(2) Midhun V M, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Basil Bassey Oyonumoh, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

(2) Dilip Kumar Darjee, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

(3) Muhammad Saad Nauman, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(4) Mukesh Kumar Chourase, Makhanlal Chaturvedi National University of Journalism and Communication (MCNUJC), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asfaw Temesgen Bari, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Midhun V M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Policy Framework for Responsible AI Deployment in the National Cybersecurity Strategy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rachana Pathak, University of Lucknow, India.

(2) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

(3) Prof. Qing-Wen Wang, Shanghai University, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Seun Michael Oyekunle, Ekiti State University, Nigeria.

(2) N.Venkateswaran, Jyothishmathi Institute of Technology and Science (Autonomous), India.

(3) Pavan Nutalapati, Oracle Corp, USA.

(4) Asad Raza, Hyderabad Institute for Technology and Management Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joseph chukwunweike, UK.

(2) Meena Sachdeva, Jims Engineering Management Technical campus Greater Noida, India.

(3) V Karamchand Gandhi, Jesu Arts and Science College, India.

(4) Yijie Weng, University of Maryland College Park, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seun Michael Oyekunle, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N.Venkateswaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pavan Nutalapati, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Asad Raza, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | J. ch from  JAMCS to AJARR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA