Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Midde Sai Kumar, India.

(2) Madahb Kumar Datta, Sri Sri University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Midde Sai Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madahb Kumar Datta, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof . Angélica Machi Lazarin, State University of Maringá,  Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Anju Mangotra, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Amna Yousaf, Kinnaird College for Women, Pakistan.

(3) Akbar Mohammadidoust, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suchitra Ku Panigrahy, Kalinga University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anju Mangotra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amna Yousaf, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Akbar Mohammadidoust, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravish Gupta, Dr. C.V. Raman University, India.

(2) Osama Fouda, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(3) S Sangeeta Kumari, IIT Bhubaneswar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhumika Shah, University of the Cumberlands, USA.

(2) Fahad Rahul, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravish Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Osama Fouda, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S Sangeeta Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kate Coleman-Sarfo, Ghana.

(2) Ahmad Ahmadzadehamiri, Iran.

(3) Jeevan R. Rajguru, India.

(4) Marvel Reuben Suwitono, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.82/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kate Coleman-Sarfo, Ghana) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmad Ahmadzadehamiri, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jeevan R. Rajguru, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Marvel Reuben Suwitono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Sallam, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU),United Arab Emirates.

(2) Shahan Ahmed, Montclair State University, United States.

(3) Thongam Kapeelta Devi, Nightingale Institute of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amrut Arun Swami, Dr. S. S. Tantia Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, India.

(2) Micheal Vincent Abiodun, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(3) Rehan Haider, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.03/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Sallam, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahan Ahmed, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Thongam Kapeelta Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhirenkumar Babubhai Bhoi, India.

(2) Aparana Sharma, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amandeep Singh, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India.

(2) Binayak Dash, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(3) James Hellyward, Andalas University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhirenkumar Babubhai Bhoi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aparana Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Muscettola, Banco BPM, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, India.

(2) .Ragubalan, The Gandhigram Rural Institute, India.

(3) Nathan Andrie Ama, Southern Leyte State University-Hinunangan Campus, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) André Pedral Sampaio de Sena, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brasil.

(2) John Atsu Agbolosoo, Egerton University, Kenya.

(3) Nazmi Nazni Noordin, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia.

(4) Warsiyah, Asia e University, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Kumar Mishra, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M.Ragubalan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nathan Andrie Ama, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sreejesh P C, St Aloysius College, India.

(2) Arijit Ash, Mankar Institute of Education and Research of Pharmacy Science, India.

(3) Kerem URAL, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Janani P R, Padamavani Arts and Science College for Women, India.

(2) Mykola Zhelavskyi, Higher educational institution «Podillia State University», Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sreejesh P C, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arijit Ash, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kerem URAL, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Lakshminarayana SA, Dr. M.G.R. Educational And Research Institute, India.

(2) Farah Ali Hameed, Institute of Medical Technology, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Meison Abdulbary Abdullah, University of Kufa, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Osamah Faisal Kokaz, AL-Muthanna university, Iraq.

(2) Zahraa Kareem Raheem, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lakshminarayana SA, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farah Ali Hameed, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Meison Abdulbary Abdullah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho,University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Seenivasan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Nishi Keshari, Dr. RPCAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohite Prajakta Anil, SKUAST-Kashmir, India.

(2) Priyanka Rani, Dr. Y.S.R. Horticulture University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Seenivasan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nishi Keshari, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA