Peer Review History: Transition from Local Markets to Digital Platforms: A Study on Barriers to the Usage of Affordable Digital Marketing Tools among Rural Women Entrepreneurs in Karnataka

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

(2) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunday Isdory Mkama, The Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy, Tanzania.

(2) Poorva Tripathi, India.

(3) Mahtab Alam, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aishwariya Kannan, United states.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunday Isdory Mkama, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Poorva Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahtab Alam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Continuous Improvement Practices and Project Delivery Performance in Energy Projects

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Garziad Mouad, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Iqtiar Md Siddique, The University of Texas at El Paso, USA.

(2) Jose Salvador da Motta Reis, Associacao Educacional Dom Bosco, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed   El-Gibaly, Beni Suef University, Egypt.

(2) Odashev Iqboljon Mashrabjonovich, Institute for Macroeconomic and Regional Studies, Uzbekistan.

(3) Uday Surendra Yandamuri, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Iqtiar Md Siddique, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jose Salvador da Motta Reis, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Constraints Faced by Women Trainees of Krishi Vigyan Kendra’s in Adopting Value Addition Technologies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Rathiranee Yogendrarajah, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka.

(2) Prameela S Shetty, SDM PG Centre for Management Studies and Research, India.

(3) S.Saranya, Alagappa University, India.

(4) Anju Singh, IIS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avninder kaur Dhillon, Master Tara Singh Memorial College for Women, Panjab University Chandigarh, India.

(2) Kundori, Universitas Maritim AMNI, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rathiranee Yogendrarajah, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prameela S Shetty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.Saranya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Anju Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Contract Farming in Kumaon Division of Uttarakhand, India: An Analysis of Socio-Economic Profiles and Attitude of Contract Farmers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, University of Western Macedonia, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Selcuk Bakan, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Turkey.

(2) Vanishri R Hundekar, KLS Gogte Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Nazmi@Nazni Noordin, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Raghubar Prasad Singh, Mahatma Gandhi College, India.

(2) Brindha D, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Selcuk Bakan, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vanishri R Hundekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nazmi@Nazni Noordin, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Share Analysis of Pesticide Companies in Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

(2) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Savan P. Padaliya , Anand Agricultural University, India.

(2) Gangadhara Doggalli, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Savan P. Padaliya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gangadhara Doggalli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Genetic Variation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. and Triticum durum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Bibi Abdallah Bakari, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(2) Rajesh J. Panchal, S. D. Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Messaouda Terchi, Institute of Science, University Center of Barika, Algeria.

(2) Nikitidis O. Nikolaos, University of Thessaly, Greece.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bibi Abdallah Bakari, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajesh J. Panchal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mulberry Nutrition and Its Influence on Silkworm Growth and Cocoon Yield

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Mohamed Ezzat Abd El-Salam, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sivanantha J, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Alok Gupta, India.

(3) Paquito G. Fernando, Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/1

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sivanantha, J India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alok Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Paquito G. Fernando , Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Anatomical, Proximate and Elemental Analyses of the Bark of Three Khaya Species Growing in Nigeria for Medicinal Use

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Tageldin Hussein Nasroun, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Sudan.

(2) Jyoti Chandola, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arun Kumar Rath, Sri Jayadev College of Education and Technology affiliation under Utkal University, India.

(2) Ogbonnaya, Obioma, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike, Nigeria.

(3) Prativa Sadhu, Dibrugarh University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tageldin Hussein Nasroun, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Chandola, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Machine Learning Based Attack Detection and Prevention in Blockchain

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vishal K. Pandya, Shri V.J. Modha College of IT, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Knitchepon Chotchantarakun, Burapha University, Thailand.

(2) Veeramani R, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Kiran Jadhav, Nutan Maharashtra Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.Aruna, A.V.C.College of Engineering, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Knitchepon Chotchantarakun, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Veeramani R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kiran Jadhav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: District-wise Distribution and Severity of Bacterial Leaf Blight of Rice Caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in Northern Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mutari Abubakari, CSIR – SARI stationed in Nyankpala, Ghana.

Reviewers:

(1) J.Sailaja Rani, Acharya N.G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) S.Vanitha, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manu Mitra, University of Bridgeport, USA.

(2) M.I. Delighta Mano Joyce, Sadakathullah Appa College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J.Sailaja Rani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.Vanitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA