Category Archives: Uncategorized

Peer Review History: EFFECT OF ADMINISTERING SERIALLY DILUTED SUPRECUR AND MOTILIUM (Dopamine Blocker) ON THE BREEDING PERFORMANCE OF Clarias gariepinus

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed KARMAOUI, University Moulay Ismail, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Shikha Shrivastava, Indira Gandhi government PG College, India.

(2) Retno Hartati, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shikha Shrivastava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Retno Hartati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Influence of Different Concentrations of GA3 on Germination of Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus undatus) Seeds

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Musa Saheed, Admiralty University of Nigeria and University of Benin, Nigeria.

(2) S. K. Verma, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(3) Pydi Lepakshi, Dr. YSR Horticultural University, India.

(4) Ashwath M N, College of Agriculture, UAS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muzafar Mir, SKUAST-Jammu, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.925/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Musa Saheed, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. K. Verma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pydi Lepakshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ashwath M N, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) to various levels and methods of nano DAP application on growth and yield.

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kuldeep Singh, RTMNU Nagpur, India.

(2) Payal N. Bhautik, Priyadarshini College of Engineering Nagpur, India.

(3) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kuldeep Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Payal N. Bhautik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effects of lead acetate toxicity in respect to histological, cytogenetical, hematological parameters and subsequent amelioration by green tea on experimental albino rats

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Farjana Sultana, College of Agricultural Sciences, IUBAT – International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Shilpa Bhargava, Biyani Girls College, India.

(2) Arizo Jan, SKUAST- Kashmir (Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shilpa Bhargava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arizo Jan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Nilotinib-induced thromboembolic Events: report of a case and focus on the main mechanisms involved

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, INDIA.

Reviewers:

(1) Digumarti Raghunadharao, India.

(2) Riordan Kennedy Broseguini de Souza, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Digumarti Raghunadharao, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Riordan Kennedy Broseguini de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA