Peer Review History: Analysis of the fatty acid compositions of oil from common seed spices

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Govindhan Perumal, PRIST University, India.

(3) Ijaz Ali, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jatin Agarwal, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Govindhan Perumal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ijaz Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Role of Probiotics and Antioxidants in Potentiating the Efficacy of Citalopram Hydrobromide for Depression Therapy: A Preclinical Study in Swiss Albino Mice Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Tiwari, Doctor Harisingh Gour Central University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Enrique Wulff, IMF-CSIC, Spain.

(2) Reza Salehinia, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Janarthanan. B, JIPMER (Govt. of India), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cengiz Mordeniz, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Turkey.

(2) Gopinath Subramanian, India.

(3) Khansaa Auda Hussein Al-Jubory, University of Thi-Qar, Iraq.

(4) P.Naresh, Dayananda Sagar University, India.

(5) Qusay Kh. Al-Dulamey, Mosul university, College of Science, Iraq.

(6) Rajkumari Vidyabati Devi, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences (JNIMS), India.

(7) Senthilkumar Meyyappan, Nalla Malla Reddy Engineering College, India.

(8) C. B. Obasoro, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Enrique Wulff, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Reza Salehinia, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Janarthanan. B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: GPS-GIS Based Assessment of Soil Micronutrients of Agriculture College Farm, Pune, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Baby Summuna, SKUAST Kashmir, India.

(2) Slamet Arif Susanto, Universitas Papua, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Edwin Alfredo Caceres Acosta, Universidad Central El Ecuador, America.

(2) Javaid Hassan, The University Of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan.

(3) Sumaira Mir, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia), Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Baby Summuna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Slamet Arif Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Water Resource Budgeting in the Narayanpur Left Bank Canal Command Area of the Upper Krishna Project, Karnataka, India: A Natural Resource Economics Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Milad Khatib, Lebanese International University, Lebanon.

(2) Veronica Mwikali Kiluva, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

(3) Sudheer Padikkal, Government of Kerala State, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali Widaa Mohammed Elamin, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

(2) P. B. Sarolkar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Milad Khatib, Lebanon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Veronica Mwikali Kiluva, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sudheer Padikkal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Thermal Requirement and Impact of Climate Change on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Middle Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gayathri J, Anna University, India.

(2) D Jayanarayana Reddy, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asnakew Takele, Ethiopia.

(2) Khin Mar Yee, University of Mandalay, Myanmar.

(3) Kajal Gupta, School of pharmacy, Maharaj Vinayak global university, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gayathri J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D Jayanarayana Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pharmacological Investigation of Withania somnifera: A Neuropharmacological Study in Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. K.V. Ramanath, Rajeev College of Pharmacy, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suyash Sawale, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) Aldarmaa Jalsrai, Institute of Traditional medicine and Technology, Mongolia.

(3) Bikram Pradhan, Bharat Institute of Science and Technology , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Smrita Singh, IFTM university, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suyash Sawale, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aldarmaa Jalsrai, Mongolia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bikram Pradhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Farming Practices on Wheat Yield, Quality Parameters and Nutrient Uptake

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean-Paul Ngbolua Koto-Te-Nyiwa, University of Kinshasa, Congo DR.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit A. Shahane , Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) DEGUI Nouara,l Blida 1 University, Algeria.

(3) Tahir Saleem, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, India.

(4) Subhashchandra J Malled, Gulbarga University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cicilia Novi Primiani , Universitas PGRI Madiun, Indonesia.

(2) G.Sivaperumal, Dhirajlal Gandhi College of Technology, India.

(3) Mahmoud O. A. Elfaki, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit A. Shahane, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (DEGUI Nouara, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tahir Saleem, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Subhashchandra J Malled, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Dietary Turmeric Powder Supplementation on Nutrient Digestibility and Haemato-biochemical Parameters in Konkan Kanyal Goats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Zirak M R Palani, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(2) Anuj Singh, BASU Patna, India.

(3) Aneela Zameer Durrani, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil Kumar, BVC, BASU, India.

(2) Mohmmd Abdullha, CCRUM, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zirak M R Palani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anuj Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aneela Zameer Durrani, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Corrosion Prediction in Steel Bridge Structures Using Artificial Neural Networks in Archipelagic Environments

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Gatbel Buony Nyuot, Gambella University, Ethiopia.

(2) P. Krithika, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali H. Wheeb, Uniersity of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) F. A. Samiul Islam, Uttara University, Bangladesh.

(3) Jasur Rashidov  Tashkent University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Uzbekistan.

(4) Ngangbam Romeji, National Institute of Technology Manipur, India.

(5) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gatbel Buony Nyuot, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Krithika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Measuring the Efficiency of Solar Energy Systems: Technological, Economic, and Environmental Perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasddin, Lakidende University, Indonesia.

(2) Mushtaque Ahmed Rahu, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasddin, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mushtaque Ahmed Rahu, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA