Peer Review History: Antioxidant System in Species Assemblages: Species and Stress Specific Effects of Abiotic Stress in Secondary Meadows of the Caucasus Mountains

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mahnaz Gümrükçüoğlu Yiğit, Sakarya University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Ahmed Saqib, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Dhia Gharabi, Ibn Khaldoun University, Algeria.

(3) Ravichandran Mariappan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohommad Miraj Hussain, India.

(2) Mahendra G.Thakare, Dr..Khatri Mahavidyalaya, India.

(3) Nuralfin Anripa, Universitas Dumoga Kotamobagu, Indonesia.

(4) Shraddha Sengar, Graduate School of Business, Indore, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Ahmed Saqib, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhia Gharabi, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ravichandran Mariappan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Leveraging AI in Finance as a Catalyst for Improving Financial Literacy and Reducing NPAs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Vasanthi Reena Williams, Vidya Vikas Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Werner R. Murhadi, University of Surabaya, Indonesia.

(3) Shaifali Garg, Amity University Madhya Pradesh, India.

(4) Arif Zunaidi, State Islamic University Syekh Wasil Kediri, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bindiya Tater, Medicaps University, India.

(2) Girish Kumar Painoli, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vasanthi Reena Williams, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Werner R. Murhadi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shaifali Garg, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arif Zunaidi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Self-service Technologies as a Catalyst for Service Excellence in Southeast Nigerian Hospitality Sector

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mugesh Kannan Reguraman, Alagappa University, India.

(2) Sandilyan Ramanujam Pagaldiviti, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mugesh Kannan Reguraman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sandilyan Ramanujam Pagaldiviti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Attitudinal Analysis of Beneficiaries towards Various Activities of Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Maulasar, Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Satyanarayana Turangi, Woxsen University, India.

(2) Haobijam James Watt, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) J.Vasanthakumar, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Vipan Kumar Rampal, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satyanarayana Turangi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Haobijam James Watt, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Preparation of Probiotic Whey Beverage Using Coconut (Cocos nucifera) Sugar as Sweetener

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Carlos Humberto Martins, State University of Maringá, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Siba Prasad Mishra, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Verma, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(2) Maurice Wanyonyi, University of Embu, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maurice Wanyonyi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bottlenecks Affecting Cold Storage Entrepreneurs and Capacity Utilization of Cold Storage Facilities

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tadeusz Hryniewicz, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

(2) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Kundan Kumar, Assam University, INDIA.

(2) Soumaila Camara, National Engineering School Abderhamane Baba Touré, Mali.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kundan Kumar, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soumaila Camara, Mali) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Phyllosphere Consortia on Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmet Turhan, The University of Uludag, Turkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Augustina Saha, School of Agricultural Sciences, Sister Nivedita University, India.

(2) Aman Tutlani, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Augustina Saha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aman Tutlani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AEROMEDICAL IMPLICATIONS OF MYOCARDIAL BRIDGING IN FLIGHT CREW: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Scicchitano Pietro, “F. Perinei” Hospital,  Altamura (BA), Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Gursoy, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

(2) Umesh Choudhary, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gursoy,  Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Umesh Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: COVID-19 and Its Effects on Cardiovascular System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Scicchitano Pietro, “F. Perinei” Hospital,  Altamura (BA), Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Shunko Andrey, Academy of Physical Education and Mass Sports, Kazakhstan.

(2) Lata. Mullur, BLDE(DU), India.

(3) Solomon M Uvoh, University of Port Harcourt River State, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

(2) M Waheed Roomi, Rath Research Institute, USA.

(3) Pranjali Dhume, Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt, India.

(4) Reza Sayyad Soufdoost, Azad University, Iran.

(5) Ruaa Maan Attallah, AL-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(6) Shadi Shafaghi, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shunko Andrey, Kazakhstan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lata. Mullur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Solomon M Uvoh, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Brand Awareness and Brand Recall in TikTok Marketing Campaigns Towards Purchase Intention of Mandaya Gen Z

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Jitendra Singh, IIMT University, India.

(2) S. Lakshmi, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(3) Dhanesh Subhash Patil, Maharashtra University, India.

(4) Hamid Ullah Khan, Pakistan.

(5) Ranjith Somasundaran Chakkambath, AMITY Global Business School, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aftab Alam Khan, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Anthony Tapiwa Mazikana, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe.

(3) Pravitha Vijaykumar GlobalNxt University, India.

(4) Suchitra Srivastava, Sagar Institute of Research & Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jitendra Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dhanesh Subhash Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hamid Ullah Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Ranjith Somasundaran Chakkambath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA