Peer Review History: Systematic Review of 6G-IoT Privacy Risks, Emerging Threats, Mitigation Strategies, and Cybersecurity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bipul Hossain, NSTU, Bangladesh.

(2) Nathaniel Adeniyi Akande, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.

(3) Cynthia Udoka Duru, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bipul Hossain, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nathaniel Adeniyi Akande, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Cynthia Udoka Duru, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Weed and Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield of Summer Pearlmillet under South Gujarat Condition, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Cente, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Abdul Aziz Lateef, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(2) Bushra Mahmood Alwan, Iraq.

(3) Aderibigbe Helen Adeniyi, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Madhab Kumar Datta, Sri Sri University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Abdul Aziz Lateef, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bushra Mahmood Alwan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aderibigbe Helen Adeniyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integration of Nephrology and Palliative Care: A Bibliometric Analysis with Visual Mapping of the 50 Most Cited Publications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tahmina Jesmin, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh.

(2) S. P. Tejaswi Pullakanam, Gayatri Vidya Parishad institute of health care & medical technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Neha, Acharya Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Bangalore & RGUHS, India.

(2) Jean Filipov, University Hospital Alexandrovska, Bulgaria.

(3) Parth Patel, Civil Hospital and BJMC Ahmedabad, India.

(4) S.K. Periyasamy, Jamal Mohamed College (Autonomous), India.

(5) Kennedy Wanyonyi Waswa, Maseno University, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tahmina Jesmin, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. P. Tejaswi Pullakanam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of FPO-Led Interventions on Knowledge Level of Tribal Millet Growers in Central India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Dr.  Abolfazl Azadi, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

(3) Dr. Varsha Rani, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Paradzai Munyede, Zimbabwe.

(2) Shruti Tiwari, India.

(3) Barbara Wieliczko, Poland.

(4) Mohammed Shehu , Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ismail Ukav, Adiyaman  University, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paradzai Munyede, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shruti Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Barbara Wieliczko, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mohammed Shehu , Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Resource Management Strategies in the Relationship between Learning Environment and Students’ Attitudes toward Mathematics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. A. Magesh, Sri Sai Ram Engineering College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Immanuel, Saveetha Engineering College, India.

(2) Fredy Sosa Gutierrez, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano, Peru.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pranab Das, Pragjyotishpur Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) Emmanuel Bizimana, Protestant University of Rwanda (PUR), Rwanda.

(3) Marianus Tapung, Catholic University of Indonesia, St. Paul Ruteng, Indonesia.

(4) Tewolde Tadele, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Immanuel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fredy Sosa Gutierrez, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unravelling Trait Interrelationship and Effects in Mapping Population Derived from Jaya × Goa Dhan 2 of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Soumya Patel, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Myrtel S. Bernardo, Bulacan Agricultural State College, Philippines.

(3) Ghassen Abid, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj-Cedria, Tunisia.

(4) Ch.Sreelakshmi, ANGRAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Archana, Chhatrapati Shivaji Degree College, India.

(2) Salisu Audu Baba, College Of Education, Zing, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soumya Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Myrtel S. Bernardo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ghassen Abid, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ch.Sreelakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of in-vitro Antioxidant Capacity of Petroleum-ether Extract of Hibiscus sabdarrifa (Roselle flower) and Jatropha tanjorensis Leaf

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bikram Keshari Das, Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences, Deemed to be University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Taufiqur Rahman Sarkar, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

(2) Chakali Ayyanna, Creative Educational Society’s College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Anilkumar U Tatiya, R.C.Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research Shirpur India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sachu Philip, SVMCH&RI, India.

(2) Kporvie Atsu Kodjo George, University of Lomé, Togo.

(3) Niketan Deshmukh, L J School of Applied Sciences, L J University, India.

(4) S. Murugesan, Pachaiyappa’s College, India.

(5) Saptarshi Mukherjee, Saveetha University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Taufiqur Rahman Sarkar, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chakali Ayyanna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anilkumar U Tatiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: THE MEDIATING ANALYSIS OF SELF-EFFICACY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANXIETY AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN MATHEMATICS OF GRADE 9 STUDENTS

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jay Aguhob Balasabas, Bayugan National Comprehensive High School, Philippines.

(2) Shoebul Haque, Era Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jay Aguhob Balasabas, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shoebul Haque, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Various Farming Practices on Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Properties in Inceptisol

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ingle Sagar Nandulal, Bihar Agricultural University Sabour, India.

(2) Suphathida Aumtong, Maejo University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mihaela Lungu, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ingle Sagar Nandulal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suphathida Aumtong, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chemical Analyses and Cost of Production of Probiotic Ambil Using Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana) Flour

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar Prajapati, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University), India.

(2) Ram Narayan Prajapati, Bundelkhand University, India.

(3) Qamar Abbas Syed, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Halla Abdul Hadi Chabuk, College of Science, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) S.Nithya Priya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ram Narayan Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Qamar Abbas Syed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA