Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Nomasonto Mthembu, North-West University, South Africa.

(2) Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda Management Institute, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nomasonto Mthembu, South Africa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

(2) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, Harbin Engineering University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Eliand Rey C. Soliman, La Consolacion College Bacolod, Philippines.

(2) Papadatu Carmen-Penelopi, “Dunarea de Jos” University from Galati, Romania.

(3) Diwakar Dhondu Kadam, D G Tatkare Arts and Commerce College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eliand Rey C. Soliman, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Papadatu Carmen-Penelopi, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Diwakar Dhondu Kadam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) K S S Kanhaiya, India.

(2) Niraj Kumar, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(3) Ridha Slaimi, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K S S Kanhaiya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Niraj Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ridha Slaimi, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ganesh S Kahar, India.

(2) Anindita Deb Pal, J.D. Birla Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ganesh S Kahar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anindita Deb Pal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Waikhom Jupiter Singh, South Asian Institute of Rural and Agricultural Management (SAIRAM), India.

(2) Manisha Thakur, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waikhom Jupiter Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manisha Thakur, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) V.Jothi Francina, Sona College of Technology, India.

(2) A Sangamithra, Bharathiar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V.Jothi Francina, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A Sangamithra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Julio Cesar Queiroz Penha, Federal Fluminense University, Brazil.

(2) Iman Ben Hamza, Libya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Julio Cesar Queiroz Penha, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iman Ben Hamza, Libya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Ciurea, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Stabak Roy, University of Gdansk, Poland.

(2) Mehari Mekonnen, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

(3) Shallu Aggarwal, Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Stabak Roy, Poland) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehari Mekonnen, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shallu Aggarwal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Chaudhry, India.

(2) Peter William Hadden, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

(3) Yerikala Ramesh, Ratnam Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunil Chaudhry, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Peter William Hadden, New Zealand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yerikala Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Muthayammal College of Arts and Science, India.

(2) Dr. S. Prabhu, Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anshu Deep Khalkho, Bharti Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Haidar Ali, Govt. Degree College, Shravasti, India.

(3) Sidra Muhyuddin, The Women University Multan, Pakistan.

(4) Naisergik Deepika Khanna, NSCBM Government College Hamirpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anshu Deep Khalkho, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Haidar Ali, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sidra Muhyuddin, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Naisergik Deepika Khanna, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA