Peer Review History: Screening and Characterization of High Efficiency Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria from the Rhizospheres of Sangareddy District, Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Shyam Praveen Rajendran, The Indian Public School, India.

(2) Junir Antônio Lutinski, Unochapecó, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suleymen Abdureman Omer, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shyam Praveen Rajendran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Junir Antônio Lutinski, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fecal and Salivary Microbial Gene Markers for the Non-invasive Detection of Colorectal Cancer Progression

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Ammar Mahmood Al-Aalim, Mosul University, Iraq.

(2) Hanaa Salih Abd Ali Alrammah, University of Plymouth, Iraq.

(3) Sumukh Nerurkar, Sharad Pawar Dental College, India.

(4) Navendra Jha, VRIMS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhavani.N.S, Bharatividyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, India.

(2) Faehaa Azher Al-Mashhadane, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Neha Singh, Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ammar Mahmood Al-Aalim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanaa Salih Abd Ali Alrammah, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sumukh Nerurkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Navendra Jha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Incidental Finding of Polycystic Kidneys in a Persian Cat with Lower Urinary Tract Disease: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) S.YOGESHPRIYA, TAMIL NADU VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY, INDIA.

(2) Talha Javaid, Multan University of Science and Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. YOGESHPRIYA, INDIA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Talha Javaid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modelling and Forecasting of Asymmetric Price Volatility of Onion for Lucknow Market, UP, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University and Kuban State Techno-logical University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhijit Biswas, India.

(2) Doaa Abd Khalil Elhertaniy, University of the Holy Quran and Taseel of Science, Sudan.

(3) A.A.M.D. Amarasinghe, Sabaragamuwa University, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Badintorn Buarod, Rajabhat Suratthani University, Thailand.

(2) Mandyam Rangayyan Roopashree, UK.

(3) Prakash Kumar, ICAR-IASRI, India.

(4) V. Nirmala, Periyar University, Sri Sarada College for Women (Autonomous), INDIA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhijit Biswas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Doaa Abd Khalil Elhertaniy, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A.A.M.D. Amarasinghe, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integration of Remote Sensing and Crop Modeling for Yield Prediction: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Monier Morad Wahba, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, Parul University, India.

(2) Viyan G.Mohammed, University of Duhok, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adib Saad, Manara University, Syria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Viyan G.Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: SOIL FERTILITY DEGRADATION AND LAND USE PATTERN IN AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES: A STUDY IN COOCH BEHAR DISTRICT OF WEST BENGAL, INDIA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Laydong Lepcha, Sikkim State Council of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Mamadou Baba Konate, University of Segou, Mali.

(3) R. Sugunthakunthalambigai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Togdjim Jonas, Higher National Institute of Sciences and Techniques of Abéché, Chad.

(2) V Naga Siva Rama Murthy, Ramachandra College of Engineering(A), India.

(3) Walter Dos Reis Pedreira Filho, Fundação Jorge Duprat Figueiredo de Segurança e Medicina do Trabalho, Brasil.

(4) Meenakhi Prusty, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Laydong Lepcha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mamadou Baba Konate, Mali) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R. Sugunthakunthalambigai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal_Change to AJAEES from JSRR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hydrogels as an Emerging Water Management Tool for Sustainable Vegetable Production: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernández, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Nuralfin Anripa, Universitas Dumoga Kotamobagu, Indonesia.

(2) Augusto Tulmann Neto, Brazil.

(3) Aadil Akbar Wani, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lóránt Dénes Dávid, John von Neuman University, Hungary.

(2) Shabir Ahmad Bhat, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

(3) Vinicius Teixeira do Nascimento, National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Rio de Janeiro.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nuralfin Anripa, Indonesia.) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Augusto Tulmann Neto, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aadil Akbar Wani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Processing-Induced Modifications in Techno-Functional Properties of Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Flour

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernández, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Fawad Ali, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

(2) Huma Parveen, IFTM University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fawad Ali China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Huma Parveen India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physico-chemical Characterisation of Indigenous Mango Germplasm from the Foothills of Punjab, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) S.Chandraprabh, SRM College of Agricultural Science, India.

(2) Ch. S. Anuradha, Dr. V.S.Krishna Government Degree, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S.Chandraprabh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ch. S. Anuradha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | J.Ch. to JSRR from ARJA | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Off-label Clinical Applications of Olanzapine: A Narrative Review of Mechanisms, Efficacy and Safety

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Abdurrahman Khan, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences,India.

(2) Isabel dos Santos, GTS Academia, Portugal.

(3) Sradhanjali Biswal , India .

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohamamd Ziaullah, VTU Belgavi, India.

(2) Saurabh Dilip Bhandare, Nashik Gramin Shikshan Prasarak Mandal’s college of pharmacy, Bramhavalley college of pharmacy, SPPU, India.

(3) S Balaji, Cancer Institute (WIA), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Abdurrahman Khan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Isabel dos Santos, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sradhanjali Biswal , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA